4.5 Article

Enhancement of Capture Sensitivity for Circulating Tumor Cells in a Breast Cancer Patient's Blood by Silicon Nanowire Platform

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 645-655

Publisher

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2016.2200

Keywords

Circulating Tumor Cells; Silicon Nanowire Platform; Streptavidin Functionalization; Poly-L-Lysine; Capture Sensitivity; Breast Cancer

Funding

  1. Priority Research Centers Program
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2009-00938817, 2013R1A12012685]
  3. Global Excellent Technology Innovation R&D Program - Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Republic of Korea [10038702-2010-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The separation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from the blood of cancer patients with high sensitivity is an essential technique for selecting chemotherapeutic agents at a patient-by-patient level. Recently, various research groups have reported a nanostructure-based platform for rare cell capture due to its high surface area and 3D nanotopographic features. However, evaluation of capture sensitivity based on chemical modification of the nanostructure surface has not yet been performed. Here, we evaluated the capture sensitivity for CTCs from the blood of three patients diagnosed with stage IV metastatic breast cancer by using the following three platforms: streptavidin-conjugated silicon nanowire (STR-SiNW), poly-l-lysine-coated silicon nanowire (PLL-SiNW), and poly-l-lysine-coated glass (PLL-glass). The number of evaluated CTCs on STR-SiNW, PLL-SiNW, and PLL-glass were 16.2 +/- 5.5 cells, 7.3 +/- 2.9 cells, and 4.7 +/- 1.5 cells, respectively, per 0.5 ml. Therefore, we suggest that the STR-SiNW platform is highly adaptable for the quantitative evaluation of CTCs from the blood of cancer patients in the clinical setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available