4.6 Article

Rostrocaudal patterning and neural crest differentiation of human pre-neural spinal cord progenitors in vitro

Journal

STEM CELL REPORTS
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 894-910

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.02.018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Medical Research Council [FC001-157]
  2. Wellcome Trust [FC001-157, 210987/Z/18/Z]
  3. British Heart Foundation [FS/12/37/29516]
  4. Medical Research Council [U117597140]
  5. Francis Crick Institute - Cancer Research UK [FC001-157]
  6. Wellcome Trust [210987/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated the generation of pre-neural progenitors (PNPs) with self-renewal capacity from neuromesodermal progenitors (NMPs), capable of maintaining spinal cord identity and producing neural crest progenitors. By inhibiting GDF11-mediated signaling, PNPs and NC population with a thoracic identity can be produced and maintained for up to 30 passages.
The spinal cord emerges from a niche of neuromesodermal progenitors (NMPs) formed and maintained by WNT/fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signals at the posterior end of the embryo. NMPs can be generated from human pluripotent stem cells and hold promise for spinal cord replacement therapies. However, NMPs are transient, which compromises production of the full range of rostrocaudal spinal cord identities in vitro. Here we report the generation of NMP-derived pre-neural progenitors (PNPs) with stem cell-like self-renewal capacity. PNPs maintain pre-spinal cord identity for 7-10 passages, dividing to self-renew and to make neural crest progenitors, while gradually adopting a more posterior identity by activating colinear HOX gene expression. The HOX clock can be halted through GDF11-mediated signal inhibition to produce a PNP and NC population with a thoracic identity that can be maintained for up to 30 passages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available