4.2 Article

Comparative lipid analysis in the normal and cancerous organoids of MDCK cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 159, Issue 6, Pages 573-584

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jb/mvw001

Keywords

K-Ras; MDCK; mass spectrometry; organoid; sphingolipids

Funding

  1. Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities (Lipid World for Clinical Application) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epithelial organs are made of a well-polarized monolayer of epithelial cells, and their morphology is maintained strictly for their proper functioning. The roles of lipids are not only to generate the membrane, but also to provide the specific domains for signal transduction, or to transmit signals as second messengers. By using a liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-MS)/MS method, we here analyzed sphingolipids in MDCK cysts under various conditions. Our result showed that, compared to the three-dimensional cyst, the two-dimensional MDCK sheet is relatively enriched in sphingolipids. During cystogenesis, the contents of sphingomyelin (SM) and lactocylceramide (LacCer)-but, none those of ceramide, hexocylceramide, or GM3-are altered depending on their acyl chains. While the total SM is decreased more efficiently by SMS-1 knockdown than by SMS-2 knockdown, depletion of SMS-2, but not SMS-1, inhibits cyst growth. Finally upon the switching on of activated K-Ras expression which induces luminal cell filling, ceramide and LacCer are increased. Our parallel examinations of the microarray data for mRNA of sphingolipid metabolic enzymes failed to fully explain the remodelling of the sphingolipids of MDCK cysts. However, these results should be useful to investigate the cell-type-and structure-specific lipid metabolism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available