4.6 Article

Experimental Study of Mechanical Properties of Polypropylene Random Copolymer and Rice-Husk-Based Biocomposite by Using Nanoindentation

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15051956

Keywords

nanoindentation; biocomposite; polypropylene random copolymer; rice husk; hardness; modulus; fiber reinforced composite

Funding

  1. University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Lahore [ORIC/107-ASRB/60]
  2. TU Delft, the Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanoindentation was used to investigate the surface-mechanical properties of biocomposites. The results showed that the interfacial bonding between the polymer and the rice husk can be enhanced by treatment, leading to improvements in the modulus and hardness of the biocomposite. Furthermore, biocomposites based on BRH and talc exhibited superior tribological properties.
Nanoindentation is widely used to investigate the surface-mechanical properties of biocomposites. In this study, polypropylene random copolymer (PPRC) and biowaste rice husk (BRH) were used as the main raw materials, and glass-fiber-reinforced polypropylene and talc were also used with BRH to enhance the mechanical characterization of the biocomposites. The interfacial bonding between the polymer and the rice husk was increased by treating them with maleic anhydride and NaOH, respectively. The results obtained from the nanoindentation indicated that the plastic behavior of the biocomposites was prominent when untreated BRH was used and vice versa. The modulus and hardness of the biocomposite improved by 44.8% and 54.8% due to the neat PPRC, respectively. The tribological properties were studied based on the hardness-to-modulus ratio and it was found that BRH- and talc-based biocomposites were better than other samples in terms of low friction and wear rate. The creep measurements showed that untreated rice husk biocomposite exhibited high resistance to load deformation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available