4.6 Article

A multitask GNN-based interpretable model for discovery of selective JAK inhibitors

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMINFORMATICS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13321-022-00593-9

Keywords

Selective JAK inhibitors; GNN; Multitask learning; Model interpretations; Key substructures; Applicability domain

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0904800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81872800, 82173746]
  3. Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism (Shanghai Municipal Education Commission) [2021 Sci Tech 03-28]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully predicts the compound activity of JAK isoforms and provides a method to design selective JAK inhibitors.
The Janus kinase (JAK) family plays a pivotal role in most cytokine-mediated inflammatory and autoimmune responses via JAK/STAT signaling, and administration of JAK inhibitors is a promising therapeutic strategy for several diseases including COVID-19. However, to screen and design selective JAK inhibitors is a daunting task due to the extremely high homology among four JAK isoforms. In this study, we aimed to simultaneously predict pIC(50) values of compounds for all JAK subtypes by constructing an interpretable GNN multitask regression model. The final model performance was positive, with R-2 values of 0.96, 0.79 and 0.78 on the training, validation and test sets, respectively. Meanwhile, we calculated and visualized atom weights, followed by the rank sum tests and local mean comparisons to obtain key atoms and substructures that could be fine-tuned to design selective JAK inhibitors. Several successful case studies have demonstrated that our approach is feasible and our model could learn the interactions between proteins and small molecules well, which could provide practitioners with a novel way to discover and design JAK inhibitors with selectivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available