4.5 Review

Neuron analysis through the swarming procedures for the singular two-point boundary value problems arising in the theory of thermal explosion

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS
Volume 137, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02869-3

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to provide neural investigations for singular two-point boundary value problems in the theory of thermal explosion using artificial neural networks and particle swarm optimization. The optimization of error function based on large, medium, and small neurons is compared for accuracy and complexity cost, with the proposed scheme's precision validated through comparison with reference solutions and data generalization via statistical analysis.
The motive of this work is to provide the neural investigations using the artificial neural networks (ANNs) through the particle swarm optimization for the singular two-point (STP) boundary value problems (BVPs), i.e., STP-BVPs arising in the theory of thermal explosion. The main purpose of this work is to perform the neural studies based on the large and small (45, 15, 3) neurons together with the complexity cost. The neuron performances have been designated in the form of absolute error. The best results have been achieved in case of large neurons as compared to small neurons, but the complexity cost gets high. The optimization measures of an error function are performed by using the swarming computational global search scheme along with the local search interior-point algorithms (IPA) for the STP-BVPs arising in the theory of thermal explosion. The exactness of the proposed scheme is approved by using the comparison of the obtained and reference solutions. Moreover, the generalization of the data is proposed in terms of statistical analysis to substantiate the capability and trustworthiness of the designed approach for the STP-BVPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available