4.7 Review

Tumor Immune Microenvironment of Brain Metastases: Toward Unlocking Antitumor Immunity

Journal

CANCER DISCOVERY
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 1199-1216

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0976

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [5R01CA227156-021, R21CA220253-0A01, 1R01CA244975-01]
  2. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
  3. Ben and Catherine Ivy Foundation
  4. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  5. Demetra Fund of the Hellenic Women?s Club
  6. Terry and Jean de Gunzburg MGH Research Scholar Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the clinical landscape of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the central nervous system (CNS) and the immunobiology of the CNS, with a focus on the role of glial cells in the immune response to brain metastasis (BrM).
Brain metastasis (BrM) is a devastating complication of solid tumors associated with poor outcomes. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer, but determinants of response are incompletely understood. Given the rising incidence of BrM, improved understanding of immunobiologic principles unique to the central nervous system (CNS) and dissection of those that govern the activity of ICIs are paramount toward unlocking BrM-specific antitumor immunity. In this review, we seek to discuss the current clinical landscape of ICI activity in the CNS and CNS immunobiology, and we focus, in particular, on the role of glial cells in the CNS immune response to BrM. Significance: There is an urgent need to improve patient selection for and clinical activity of ICIs in patients with cancer with concomitant BrM. Increased understanding of the unique immunobiologic principles that govern response to ICIs in the CNS is critical toward identifying targets in the tumor microenvironment that may potentiate antitumor immunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available