4.6 Article

Noise Exposure in TKA Surgery; Oscillating Tip Saw Systems vs Oscillating Blade Saw Systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
Volume 31, Issue 12, Pages 2773-2777

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.030

Keywords

TKA surgery; hearing loss; orthopedic theater; saw blade; noise-induced hearing loss

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Historically it has been suggested that noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) affects approximately 50% of the orthopedic surgery personnel. This noise may be partially caused by the use of powered saw systems that are used to make the bone cuts. The first goal was to quantify and compare the noise emission of these different saw systems during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery. A second goal was to estimate the occupational NIHL risk for the orthopedic surgery personnel in TKA surgery by quantifying the total daily noise emission spectrum during TKA surgery and to compare this to the Dutch Occupational Health Organization guidelines. Methods: A conventional sagittal oscillating blade system with a full oscillating blade and 2 newer oscillating tip saw systems (handpiece and blade) were compared. Noise level measurements during TKA surgery were performed during cutting and hammering, additionally surgery noise profiles were made. Results: The noise level was significantly lower for the oscillating tip saw systems compared to the conventional saw system, but all were in a range that can cause NIHL. The conventional system handpiece produced a considerable higher noise level compared to oscillating tip handpiece. Conclusion: NIHL is an underestimated problem in the orthopedic surgery. Solutions for decreasing the risk of hearing loss should be considered. The use of oscillating tip saw systems have a reduced noise emission in comparison with the conventional saw system. The use of these newer systems might be a first step in decreasing hearing loss among the orthopedic surgery personnel. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available