4.7 Review

Insights into endogenous Bifidobacterium species in the human gut microbiota during adulthood

Journal

TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 10, Pages 940-947

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2022.04.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) , through the Irish Government's National Development Plan [SFI/12/RC/2273-P1, SFI/12/RC/2273-P2]
  2. Ministero della Salute [RF GR-2018-12365988]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bifidobacteria are early and abundant colonizers of the neonatal gut in many mammals, but their functional contributions to adult health and well-being are less explored. This opinion piece discusses the relevance of endogenous Bifidobacterium species associated with adulthood and proposes enrichment of the microbiota with strains of Bifidobacterium more adapted to the adult host, which can improve our understanding of the ecological, metabolic, and functional roles played by Bifidobacterium across various host ages.
Bifidobacteria are among the earliest and most abundant bacterial colonizers of the neonatal gut in many mammals, where they elicit purported host health benefits. While early life-associated dynamics and diversity, as well as the metabolic and beneficial activities, of Bifidobacterium species have been well studied, functional contributions of bifidobacteria to health and well-being of adults remain less explored. In this opinion piece, we discuss the current knowledge regarding the relevance of endogenous Bifidobacterium species associated with adulthood. We identify knowledge gaps and discuss opportunities for microbiota enrichment with rationally selected strains of Bifidobacterium more adapted to the adult host. We propose that current knowledge and future studies in this area will help us to better understand the ecological, metabolic, and functional roles played by Bifidobacterium in the gut ecosystem across various host ages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available