4.4 Article

Real-World Comparison of Isavuconazole and Voriconazole in Terms of the Need for Dosage Adjustments Guided by Clinical Pharmacological Advice During Primary Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infections in Pediatric Patients with Hemato-Oncological Malignancies

Journal

THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages 641-650

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000980

Keywords

oncohematologic pediatric patients; isavuconazole; voriconazole; clinical pharmacological advice; dosage adjustments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that in hemato-oncological pediatric patients, there was a low need for dose adjustments when using isavuconazole as antifungal prophylaxis, while a high need for dose adjustments when using voriconazole. Isavuconazole showed relatively stable blood concentrations, while voriconazole exhibited higher variability.
Background: Limited evidence concerning optimal azole dosing regimens currently exists for antifungal prophylaxis in hemato-oncological pediatric patients. Methods: Hemato-oncological children receiving intravenous or oral isavuconazole or voriconazole for primary antifungal prophylaxis at IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Bologna during November 2020 to October 2021 and undergoing CPA programs based on real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were retrospectively analyzed. CPAs for isavuconazole and voriconazole and the number of dosage adjustments were collected. Normalized trough concentrations [(C-min)/dose/kg] were calculated for both drugs at each TDM assessment, and the coefficient of variation was determined. The efficacy and safety of the drugs were evaluated. Results: Sixteen hemato-oncological pediatric patients received azole prophylaxis (mean age and weight: 9.1 +/- 4.9 years and 32.6 +/- 16.0 kg; 6 isavuconazole and 10 voriconazole). Sixty and 89 CPAs were delivered as isavuconazole and voriconazole, respectively. Dosage adjustments were needed in 3.3% of cases for isavuconazole and 53.9% of cases for voriconazole (P < 0.001). At first TDM, achievement of the desired target during standard dosing regimens was higher for isavuconazole (83.3%) than for voriconazole (10.0%; P = 0.008). Dispersion of normalized concentrations was higher for voriconazole (CV = 139.1% vs. CV = 79.4%). Elevation of ALT and aspartate aminotransferase levels between baseline and the third month was higher in patients receiving voriconazole (median, 28 vs. 90 U/L; P = 0.038, and 19 vs. 65.5 U/L; P = 0.002). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that there is limited variability in isavuconazole exposure in hemato-oncological pediatric patients receiving azole prophylaxis, resulting in a low need for CPA-guided dosage adjustments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available