Accident causation models developed in China between 1978 and 2018: Review and comparison
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Accident causation models developed in China between 1978 and 2018: Review and comparison
Authors
Keywords
Accident causation model, Accident Causation ‘‘2-4’’ Model, Trajectory Intersecting Model, Two Types of Hazard Model, Three Types of Hazard Model, Comprehensive Accident Causes Model
Journal
SAFETY SCIENCE
Volume 148, Issue -, Pages 105653
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2022-01-10
DOI
10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105653
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A combined fuzzy DEMATEL and cloud model approach for risk assessment in process industries to improve system reliability
- (2021) Jishuo Li et al. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL
- Study on resource utilization of composite powder suppressor prepared from acrylic fiber waste sludge
- (2021) Bo Liu et al. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
- Cloud model-clustering analysis based evaluation for ventilation system of underground metal mine in alpine region
- (2021) Fang Yan et al. Journal of Central South University
- Psychophysiological data-driven multi-feature information fusion and recognition of miner fatigue in high-altitude and cold areas
- (2021) Shoukun Chen et al. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
- Hydrogen inhibition in wet dust removal systems by using L-aspartic: A feasible way of hydrogen explosion control measures
- (2021) Yuyuan Zhang et al. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES
- A new accident causation theory based on systems thinking and its systemic accident analysis method of work systems
- (2021) Ji Ge et al. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
- The Accident Path of Coal Mine Gas Explosion Based on 24Model: A Case Study of the Ruizhiyuan Gas Explosion Accident
- (2019) Gui Fu et al. Processes
- The history, logic and trends of the discipline of safety science in China
- (2019) Chuansheng Jiang et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Public perceptions of autonomous vehicle safety: An international comparison
- (2019) Joanna Moody et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Theorizing and theory building in the safety sciences: A reflective inquiry
- (2019) K. Klockner et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- What is the object of safety science?
- (2019) Ji Ge et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- The main challenges of safety science
- (2019) Ji Ge et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Flame propagation of corn starch in a modified Hartmann tube with branch structure
- (2019) Bo Han et al. POWDER TECHNOLOGY
- The development history of accident causation models in the past 100 years: 24Model, a more modern accident causation model
- (2019) Gui Fu et al. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
- Statistical analysis the characteristics of extraordinarily severe coal mine accidents (ESCMAs) in China from 1950 to 2018
- (2019) Jinjia Zhang et al. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
- Systematic study on ash transformation behaviour and thermal kinetic characteristics during co-firing of biomass with high ratios of bituminous coal
- (2019) Xiwen Yao et al. RENEWABLE ENERGY
- Perceived safety and attributed value as predictors of the intention to use autonomous vehicles: A national study with Spanish drivers
- (2019) Luis Montoro et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Safety science as a new discipline in China
- (2019) Bing Wang et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Models and methods for collision analysis: A comparison study based on the Uber collision with a pedestrian
- (2019) Neville A. Stanton et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Safety informatics as a new, promising and sustainable area of safety science in the information age
- (2019) Bing Wang et al. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
- A set pair analysis based layer of protection analysis and its application in quantitative risk assessment
- (2018) Fang Yan et al. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES
- Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age
- (2018) Lynn M. Hulse et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Work safety in China’s Thirteenth Five-Year plan period (2016–2020): Current status, new challenges and future tasks
- (2018) Bing Wang et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Safety analysis of lithium-ion battery by rheology-mutation theory coupling with fault tree method
- (2017) Chuang Qi et al. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES
- Comparative study of HFACS and the 24Model accident causation models
- (2017) Gui Fu et al. Petroleum Science
- Developments in the safety science domain, in the fields of general and safety management between 1970 and 1979, the year of the near disaster on Three Mile Island, a literature review
- (2016) Paul Swuste et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety
- (2015) Patrick Waterson et al. ERGONOMICS
- New models for new times. An anti-dualist move
- (2013) Jean-Christophe Le Coze SAFETY SCIENCE
- Occupational safety theories, models and metaphors in the three decades since World War II, in the United States, Britain and the Netherlands: A literature review
- (2013) Paul Swuste et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Systems Theory as the Foundation for Understanding Systems
- (2013) Kevin MacG. Adams et al. Systems Engineering
- Occupational injury and accident research: A comprehensive review
- (2012) Vivek V. Khanzode et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Outlines of a sensitising model for industrial safety assessment
- (2012) Jean-christophe Le Coze SAFETY SCIENCE
- Learning from the past and knowledge management: Are we making progress?
- (2008) Hans J. Pasman JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES
- Towards an evaluation of accident investigation methods in terms of their alignment with accident causation models
- (2008) Panagiota Katsakiori et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started