4.5 Article

Perceived safety in physical human-robot interaction-A survey

Journal

ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2022.104047

Keywords

Physical human robot interaction; Perceived safety; Trust; Comfort; UAVs; Self-driving cars

Funding

  1. Nazarbayev University [091019CRP2118, 091019CRP2107]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review paper summarizes the various aspects of perceived safety in autonomous physical systems, including related concepts, assessment methods, categories of autonomous systems, and their impact on perceived safety. The paper provides an overview and analysis of the research in this field, and discusses experimental duration, location, and the connection to safety standards.
This review paper focuses on different aspects of perceived safety for a number of autonomous physical systems. This is a major aspect of robotics research, as more and more applications allow humans and autonomous systems to share their space, with crucial implications both on safety and on its perception. The alternative terms used to express related concepts (e.g., psychological safety, trust, comfort, stress, fear, and anxiety) are listed and explained. Then, the available methods to assess perceived safety (i.e., questionnaires, physiological measurements, behavioral assessment, and direct input devices) are described. Six categories of autonomous systems are considered (industrial polyarticulated manipulators, indoor mobile robots, mobile manipulators, humanoid robots, drones, and autonomous vehicles), providing an overview of the main themes related to perceived safety in the specific domain, a description of selected works, and an analysis of how motion and characteristics of the system influence the perception of safety. The survey also discusses experimental duration and location of the reviewed papers, and the connection between perceived safety and safety standards. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available