4.6 Article

Multiple metals influence distinct properties of the Arabidopsis circadian clock

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258374

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/N018540/1, BB/V006665/1]
  3. 111 Project [D16014]
  4. BBSRC [BB/V006665/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the impact of metal salts on plant rhythms, revealing diverse effects of environmental changes on rhythms. Novel wavelet-based spectral hypothesis testing and clustering methodologies were applied to organize and understand the data.
Circadian rhythms coordinate endogenous events with external signals, and are essential to biological function. When environmental contaminants affect these rhythms, the organism may experience fitness consequences such as reduced growth or increased susceptibility to pathogens. In their natural environment plants may be exposed to a wide range of industrial and agricultural soil pollutants. Here, we investigate how the addition of various metal salts to the root-interaction environment can impact rhythms, measured via the promoter:luciferase system. The consequences of these environmental changes were found to be varied and complex. Therefore, in addition to traditional Fourier-based analyses, we additionally apply novel wavelet-based spectral hypothesis testing and clustering methodologies to organize and understand the data. We are able to classify broad sets of responses to these metal salts, including those that increase, and those that decrease, the period, or which induce a lack of precision or disrupt any meaningful periodicity. Our methods are general, and may be applied to discover common responses and hidden structures within a wide range of biological time series data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available