4.8 Article

Gradient Architecture Design in Scalable Porous Battery Electrodes

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 2521-2528

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00385

Keywords

thick electrode; porous architecture; gradient; energy storage; low-tortuosity

Funding

  1. Center for Mesoscale Transport Properties, an Energy Frontier Research Center by U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0012673]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a gradient electrode design, and by comparing different orientations of the gradient electrodes, it is found that faster energy storage kinetics can be achieved with larger openings and more concentrated active material near the separator. This research deepens the understanding of structure-related electrochemistry and provides new perspectives for high-energy battery electrode designs.
Because it has been demonstrated to be effective toward faster ion diffusion inside the pore space, low-tortuosity porous architecture has become the focus in thick electrode designs, and other possibilities are rarely investigated. To advance current understanding in the structure-affected electrochemistry and to broaden horizons for thick electrode designs, we present a gradient electrode design, where porous channels are vertically aligned with smaller openings on one end and larger openings on the other. With its 3D morphology carefully visualized by Raman mapping, the electrochemical properties between opposite orientations of the gradient electrodes are compared, and faster energy storage kinetics is found in larger openings and more concentrated active material near the separator. As further verified by simulation, this study on gradient electrode design deepens the knowledge of structure-related electrochemistry and brings perspectives in high-energy battery electrode designs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available