4.6 Article

Level set method for automated 3D brain tumor segmentation using symmetry analysis and kernel induced fuzzy clustering

Journal

MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
Volume 81, Issue 15, Pages 21719-21740

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-022-12445-7

Keywords

Automatic segmentation; 3D brain tumor segmentation; Kernel mapping; Level set method; Symmetry analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a new level set method called Fuzzy Kernel Level Set (FKLS) for brain tumor segmentation in MRI images. The method uses fuzzy c-means clustering and kernel mapping to transfer the image and extract the volume of interest. Experimental results show that the method outperforms existing segmentation methods in terms of accuracy.
Automatic brain tumor segmentation in magnetic resonance images (MRIs) is an essential stage for treatment planning. However, MR image segmentation is challenging owing to non-uniformity in the intensity distribution, tumor shape, size, and location variation. The paper proposes a new level set method that is called Fuzzy Kernel Level Set (FKLS) for 3D brain tumor segmentation in MR images. To avoid computational complexity, fast bounding box based on symmetry analysis is used to extract the volume of interest (VOI) in brain MRIs. Then, a level set method is proposed based on fuzzy c-means clustering and kernel mapping. A kernel function is used to transfer the image into another domain, where the new proposed functional is minimized. To assess the proposed FKLS method, a synthetic image and natural brain MR images from BraTS 2017 are segmented. Experimental results show that our method is superior to the state-of-the-art segmentation methods regarding the segmentation accuracy based on Dice, Jaccard, Sensitivity, and Specificity metrics. The mean values of these metrics are 97.62% +/- (0.94%), 95.41% +/- (1.8%), 98.79% +/- (0.63%), and 99.85% +/- (0.09%), respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available