4.6 Article

Processing the ores of rare-earth elements

Journal

MRS BULLETIN
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 258-266

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1557/s43577-022-00288-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Significant academic research and moderate commercial process innovation have been carried out on rare-earth element (REE) processing for decades. The last several years have witnessed exponential growth in research due to increasing demand, supply risks, and environmental obstacles. The REE industry is facing conflicting forces of public and political support for sustainability and the need for a reliable and socially responsible supply chain. Current technology and plant practice limit REE recoveries to 50-80 percent, and meeting increasing demand requires new mineral resources, improved process efficiency, and lower production costs.
Significant academic research and moderate commercial process innovation on rare-earth element (REE) processing have been underway for decades. The last several years have seen exponential growth in research due to growth in demand of REE that is threatened by supply risks and environmental obstacles. The REE industry appears to be at the intersection of strong, but conflicting forces, including public and political support for a Green Revolution and sustainability, as well as the need for a clean, reliable, and socially responsible supply chain. REE recoveries from ore are limited by current technology and plant practice to 50-80 percent. Increasing demand can be partially satisfied by recycling, but reliable and continuous increases in supply will also require new mineral resources, improved process efficiency, and lower production costs. This article reviews and summarizes the past and current REE processing technologies, commonly employed REE separation routes and methods, and suggests ways to increase efficiency in future REE processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available