4.3 Article

European Code against Cancer, 4th Edition: Cancer screening

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages S139-S152

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.10.021

Keywords

Mass screening; Breast neoplasms; Colorectal neoplasms; Uterine cervical neoplasms; Europe; Prostatic neoplasms

Funding

  1. European Union [2011 53 05, 2010 53 04, 2007IARC01]
  2. International Agency for Research on Cancer
  3. Cancer Research UK [16894] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to update the previous version of the European Code against Cancer and formulate evidence-based recommendations, a systematic search of the literature was performed according to the methodology agreed by the Code Working Groups. Based on the review, the 4th edition of the European Code against Cancer recommends: Take part in organized cancer screening programmes for: Bowel cancer (men and women) Breast cancer (women) Cervical cancer (women). Organized screening programs are preferable because they provide better conditions to ensure that the Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Screening are followed in order to achieve the greatest benefit with the least harm. Screening is recommended only for those cancers where a demonstrated life-saving effect substantially outweighs the potential harm of examining very large numbers of people who may otherwise never have, or suffer from, these cancers, and when an adequate quality of the screening is achieved. EU citizens are recommended to participate in cancer screening each time an invitation from the national or regional screening program is received and after having read the information materials provided and carefully considered the potential benefits and harms of screening. Screening programs in the European Union vary with respect to the age groups invited and to the interval between invitations, depending on each country's cancer burden, local resources, and the type of screening test used For colorectal cancer, most programs in the EU invite men and women starting at the age of 50-60 years, and from then on every 2 years if the screening test is the guaiac-based fecal occult blood test or fecal immunochemical test, or every 10 years or more if the screening test is flexible sigmoidoscopy or total colonoscopy. Most programs continue sending invitations to screening up to the age of 70-75 years. For breast cancer, most programs in the EU invite women starting at the age of 50 years, and not before the age of 40 years, and from then on every 2 years until the age of 70-75 years. For cervical cancer, if cytology (Pap) testing is used for screening, most programs in the EU invite women starting at the age of 25-30 years and from then on every 3 or 5 years. If human papillomavirus testing is used for screening, most women are invited starting at the age of 35 years (usually not before age 30 years) and from then on every 5 years or more. Irrespective of the test used, women continue participating in screening until the age of 60 or 65 years, and continue beyond this age unless the most recent test results are normal. (C) 2015 International Agency for Research on Cancer; Licensee ELSEVIER Ltd

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Comparison of Quality Measures for Detection of Neoplasia at Screening Colonoscopy

Paulina Wieszczy, Marek Bugajski, Wladyslaw Januszewicz, Maria Rupinska, Jakub Szlak, Malgorzata Pisera, Maryla H. Turkot, Maciej Rupinski, Urszula Wojciechowska, Joanna Didkowska, Jaroslaw Regula, Michal F. Kaminski

Summary: This study examined whether colonoscopy quality measures other than adenoma detection rate (ADR) are associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and death. The results showed that all quality measures, including ADR, polyp detection rate (PDR), advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR), number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC), and number of adenomas per colonoscopy with at least one adenoma (APPC), were significantly associated with CRC risk and death.

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY (2023)

Article Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

A new approach to breast cancer terminology based on the anatomic site of tumour origin: The importance of radiologic imaging biomarkers

Laszlo Tabar, Peter B. Dean, F. Lee Tucker, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Sam Li-Sheng Chen, Grace Hsiao Hsuan Jen, Jackson Wei-Chun Wang, Robert A. Smith, Stephen W. Duffy, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen

Summary: The study reveals that breast cancers originate from three different fibroglandular tissue components, and classifying them according to their site of origin helps overcome inconsistencies in current histopathologic terminology. The imaging biomarkers serve as a prognostic indicator, highlighting the increasingly crucial role of breast imaging.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2022)

Article Oncology

A randomised controlled trial of digital breast tomosynthesis vs digital mammography as primary screening tests: Screening results over subsequent episodes of the Proteus Donna study

Paola Armaroli, Alfonso Frigerio, Loredana Correale, Antonio Ponti, Franca Artuso, Denise Casella, Paolo Falco, Elisabetta Favettini, Paolo Fonio, Livia Giordano, Vincenzo Marra, Luisella Milanesio, Lia Morra, Pietro Presti, Emilia Riggi, Viviana Vergini, Nereo Segnan

Summary: Proteus Donna is a randomized controlled trial that evaluates the effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer screening. The study found that DBT detected slightly more cancers over the follow-up period, but the detection rate decreased in subsequent screenings. However, there was an increase in false positives and moderate overdiagnosis.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2022)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Third Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations on colorectal cancer screening and postpolypectomy surveillance

Joseph J. Y. Sung, Han-Mo Chiu, David Lieberman, Ernst J. Kuipers, Matthew D. Rutter, Finlay Macrae, Khay-Guan Yeoh, Tiing Leong Ang, Vui Heng Chong, Sneha John, Jingnan Li, Kaichun Wu, Simon S. M. Ng, Govind K. Makharia, Murdani Abdullah, Nozomu Kobayashi, Masau Sekiguchi, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Hyun-Soo Kim, Susan Parry, Patricia Anne Cabral-Prodigalidad, Deng-Chyang Wu, Suparkij Khomvilai, Rashid N. Lui, Sunny Wong, Yu-Min Lin, E. Dekker

Summary: The Asia-Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer Screening has updated their recommendations on screening methods, age for screening, and surveillance for individuals with a family history of CRC or advanced adenoma based on the most recent studies in the region.
Review Oncology

A Global Perspective on Gastric Cancer Screening: Which Concepts Are Feasible, and When?

Wladyslaw Januszewicz, Maryla Helena Turkot, Peter Malfertheiner, Jaroslaw Regula

Summary: Although the incidence of gastric cancer is decreasing, it remains a significant disease burden worldwide. This review article discusses existing screening programs in high-risk countries and potential screening options in intermediate- and low-risk regions.

CANCERS (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Risk Model-Based Lung Cancer Screening A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Iakovos Toumazis, Pianpian Cao, Koen de Nijs, Mehrad Bastani, Vidit Munshi, Mehdi Hemmati, Kevin ten Haaf, Jihyoun Jeon, Martin Tammemagi, G. Scott Gazelle, Eric J. Feuer, Chung Yin Kong, Rafael Meza, Harry J. de Koning, Sylvia K. Plevritis, Summer S. S. Han

Summary: In their 2021 update, the USPSTF emphasized the need for further research on the benefits and harms of risk model-based lung cancer screening strategies. This comparative modeling analysis found that risk model-based screening strategies were more cost-effective than the USPSTF recommendation, with a 6-year risk threshold of 1.2% or greater being the most cost-effective.

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2023)

Editorial Material Urology & Nephrology

Wise Prostate-specific Antigen Testing Means a Limited, Risk-adjusted, and Personal Approach

Eveline A. M. Heijnsdijk, Harry J. de Koning

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2023)

Article Oncology

Cumulative risks of false positive recall and screen-detected breast cancer after multiple screening examinations

Lindy M. Kregting, Nicolien T. van Ravesteyn, Sarocha Chootipongchaivat, Eveline A. M. Heijnsdijk, Johannes D. M. Otten, Mireille J. M. Broeders, Harry J. de Koning

Summary: Women's decision-making and adherence regarding participation in breast cancer screening are influenced by previous false-positive (FP) results. This study aimed to provide comprehensive information on the cumulative risks of FP recall and screen-detected breast cancer over multiple screening examinations. The data from the Dutch screening registry were analyzed, and it was found that after seven examinations, the cumulative risk of a true-positive (TP) result was 3.7%, while the cumulative risk of a FP result was 9.1%. Following a FP result, participation was lower, and more TP results, interval cancers, and FP results were found compared to women with true negative (TN) results.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2023)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Overcoming barriers: Modelling the effect of potential future changes of organized breast cancer screening in Italy

Nadine Zielonke, Carlo Senore, Antonio Ponti, Marcell Csanadi, Harry J. de Koning, Eveline A. M. Heijnsdijk, Nicolien T. van Ravesteyn

Summary: The study aims to address the impact of organizational and cultural barriers on breast cancer screening, specifically low attendance in Southern Italy and underscreening and overscreening in Italy as a whole. Investing in mobile screening units to increase adherence in Southern Italy is cost-effective. Harmonizing the screening interval and investing in measures to reduce opportunistic screening and mobile screening units can save costs while maintaining the same benefits.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING (2023)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

CanScreen5, a global repository for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening programs

Li Zhang, Isabel Mosquera, Eric Lucas, Mary Luz Rol, Andre L. Carvalho, Partha Basu, Daniel Sadowski, Bartlett Natasha, Alison Budd, Ashrafun Nessa, Isabel De Brabander, Annemie Haelens, Sarah Pringels, Jonas Tairo, Solveig Hofvind, J. B. Burrion, Zdravka Valerianova, Jill Tinmouth, Cindy Law, Simbi Ebenuwah, Bronwen McCurdy, Beata Janik, George Pupwe, Linn Fenna Groeneveld, Gry Baadstrand Skare, Penelope Layne, Tytti Sarkeala, Mwate Joseph Chaila, Michal Kaminski, Beata Kinel, Jolanta Lissowska, Inga Mumukunde, Vitor Rodrigues, Robinson Rodriguez, Elena Perez Sanz, Raquel Zubizarreta Alberdi, Guglielmo Ronco, Natasa Antoljak, Dinka Nakic, Davor Plazanin, Andrea Supe Parun, Mat Goossens, Andrzej Nowakowski, Harry de Koning, Els Dams, Asha Martin, Mara Epermane, Natalja Jankovska, Scott Antle, Jacques Fracheboud, Esther Toes-Zoutendijk, Heleen M. E. van Agt, Karen Budewig, Barbara Stomper, Ahti Anttila, Sorana McLeish, Alexandra Ramssl-Sauer, Georg Ziniel, Theopisti Kyprianou, Pavlos Pavlou, Fofo Kaliva, Maria Tsantidou, Shaokai Zhang, Huifang Xu, Wali Mushtaq, Biviana Paredes Barragan, Alexandra Montalvo, Ana Victoria de la Torre Santos, Marie-Helene Guertin, Sarah Fournier, Nicolas Duport, Ondrej Majek, Ondrej Ngo, Urska Ivanus, Katja Jarm, Maja Primic-Zakelj, Flavia de Miranda Correa, Arn Migowski, Marianna Cancela, Patricia Gallardo, Gisel Fattore, Adrian Puello, Victor Polanco, Nieves Ascunce Elizaga, Valerie Fabri, Paola Mantellini, Marco Zappa, Eliane Kellen, Elsebeth Lynge, Vanessa Kaab-Sanyal, Daniela Malek, Youssef Chami, Rugile Ivanauskiene, Nensy Bandhoe, Claire Dillenbourg, Karin Heckters, Astrid Scharpantgen, Oris Mariela Ruiz, Geneva Mireya Gonzalez, Elsa Arenas, Eduardo Alberto Palacios Cacacho, Alicia Pomata, Eliza Navarro, Milva Mencia, Gisela Abreu Ruiz, Ruth Campoverde, Claudia Camel, Rocio Donis, Yolanda Ines Sandoval, Heidy Garcia, Omaira Isabel Roldan, Teresa del Carmen Moreno, Mario Morales Velado, Gina Merino, Juvenal A. Rios, Sabrina Marte, Reina Oliva Hernandez, Marina Anea Chacon, Xiomara Isabel Ruiz, Xiomara del Carmen Hernandez Vivas, Roger Ivan Gonzalez, Damaris Isabel Medal Ruiz, Lourdes Ortega, Andrea Matos Orbegozo, Carlos Adolfo Chuquiyauri Haro, Miriam Dalmas, Fahriye Unlu, Loubna Abousselham, Rose-Marie De Waldt, Charlotte Buys, Yasine Hanna, Cathi-Ann Williams, Londi-Ann Ottey, Shana Philbert-Cyr, Crissah Emmanuel, Alexandra Jemmott, Nuno Augusto Alberto de Miranda, Stala Kioupi, Takelech Moges Asnake, Adel A. Attia, Gontse Tshisimogo, Lame Seema, Jonathan Chiwanda Banda, Feisul Idzwan Mustapha, Rosita Paulo Mugolo, Reginaldo de Alice Miguel Juliao, Mary Nyangasi, Valerian Mwenda, Sonia Tavares Ferreira, Carla Barbosa, Manala Makua, Yacubu Herve Julius Bakare, Myanna Charles, Leandra Charles, Vera Edwards-France, Cheshta Sewtahal, Bridget Kebirungi, Mugabe Frank Rwabinumi, Valarie Williams, Oritta Zachariah, Arlitha Scott, Camille Deleveaux, Martin Campbell, Cesaltina Ferreira, Suraj Perera, Padmaka Silva, Vindya Kumarapeli, Merisa Grant-Tate, Cherie Tulloch, Kumiko Saika, Kyeongmin Lee, Jae Kwan Jun, Sona Franklin Mukete, Plamen Dimitrov, Vaida Momkuviene, Viaceslavas Zaksas, Piret Veerus, Tatjana Kofol Bric, Dominika Novak Mlakar, Ana Lucija Skrjanec, Jozica Maucec Zakotnik, Tamar Skhirtladze, Stephanie Xuereb, Carol Colquhoun, Suleeporn Sangrajrang, Kumar Eshwar, Greig Stanners, Roger Black, Trude Andreassen, Andras Budai, Lajos Dobrossy, Attila Kovacs, Florian Nicula, Isabel Portillo, Jone Miren Altzibar, Edurne Arenaza, Ndabaningi Simango, Josep A. Espinas, Constance Glinton-Rolle, Jeanette Anews-Barr, Mariana Capote, Marisa Fazzino, Claire Armstrong, Andrew Gamble, Kenneth Mc Innes, Suzanne Wright, Helen Clayton, Radoslav Latinovic, Anne Mackie, Janet Rimmer, Clare Hall, Klara Miriam Elfstrom, Sven Tornberg, Manuel Zorzi, Marcis Leja, Dace Rezeberga, Marc Hagenimana, Francoise Hamers, Agnes Rogel, Frank Assogba, Patricia Fitzpatrick, Marc Arbyn, Jacqueline Figueroa, Alex Rovelo, Erosloa Salinas, Elias Yused Arguello, Adriana Milano Castillo, Velia Rosas, Stanislav Spanik, Merete Ronmos Houmann, Dorte Johansen, Joakim Dillner, Kunal Oswal, Yubei Huang, Ismail M. Siala, Michel Candeur, Sarah Hoeck, Josep M. Borras, Luc Bleyen, Bothwell Takaingofa Guzha, Adie Yao Mesmin Olivier, Elisabeth Fasching, Alexander Gollmer Gesundheit, Tonoy Taohid, Walkiria Bermejo Bencomo, Darbelis Tejada, Joseph Psaila Valletta, Judy Nisbett, Damaris Baptiste, Melanie Ann Layne

Summary: The CanScreen5 project is a global cancer screening data repository that aims to report the status and performance of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening programs across different countries. The data collected showed better overall organization of screening programs in Europe compared to other continents, but there were gaps in implementation across both high- and low-resource settings.

NATURE MEDICINE (2023)

Article Oncology

Assessing the impact of increasing lung screening eligibility by relaxing the maximum years-since-quit threshold. A simulation modeling study

Rafael Meza, Pianpian Cao, Koen de Nijs, Jihyoun Jeon, Robert A. Smith, Kevin ten Haaf, Harry de Koning

Summary: Expanding lung cancer screening to include individuals who formerly smoked and have quit smoking for more than 15 years would result in considerable increases in deaths averted and life-years gained. Although a modest increase in additional harms would occur, these could be moderated by ensuring that screening is restricted only to those with reasonable life expectancy.

CANCER (2023)

Editorial Material Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided placement of fiducial markers for stereotactic body radiation therapy of pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma

Marcin Polkowski, Konrad Pawlewicz, Krzysztof Skoczylas, Ewa Wronska, Malgorzata Lenarcik, Jaroslaw Regula

ENDOSCOPY (2023)

Article Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

Multifocal and diffusely infiltrating breast cancers are highly fatal subgroups needing further improvement in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies

Laszlo Tabar, Peter B. Dean, F. Lee Tucker, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen, Wendy Yi-Ying Wu, Andras Voros

Summary: Breast cancer deaths occur in a minority of breast cancers (45%) and are associated with specific subtypes of breast cancer. High mortality rates are observed in patients with multifocal acinar adenocarcinoma of the breast, diffusely invasive breast cancers of ductal origin, and breast malignancies of mesenchymal hybrid cell origin. It is important to reevaluate the histopathologic terminology, enhance imaging techniques, and implement multidisciplinary management for preventing these fatal events.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2023)

Article Oncology

Cost-effectiveness of risk-based low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Switzerland

Yuki Tomonaga, Koen de Nijs, Heiner C. Bucher, Harry de Koning, Kevin ten Haaf

Summary: This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening strategies in Switzerland and finds that risk-based screening is more cost-effective than pack-year-based screening. The most efficient strategy is biennial screening for ever-smokers aged 55 to 80 with a 1.6% risk. This strategy can significantly reduce lung cancer mortality and has a lower cost per QALY gained compared to pack-year-based screening.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2023)

Article Pediatrics

A validated Screening instrument for Child Abuse and Neglect (SCAN) at the emergency department

F. Hoedeman, P. J. Puiman, E. A. L. van den Heuvel, M. J. Affourtit, R. Bakx, M. W. Langendam, E. M. van de Putte, I. M. B. Russel-Kampschoer, M. C. M. Schouten, A. H. Teeuw, H. J. de Koning, H. A. Moll

Summary: The objective of this study was to develop and validate a screening instrument for child maltreatment in the emergency department. The researchers developed the Screening instrument for Child Abuse and Neglect (SCAN) based on data from three large observational screening studies in the Netherlands. The SCAN was validated through cross-validation and demonstrated a good discriminative ability in identifying child maltreatment.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS (2023)

No Data Available