4.8 Review

Ribosome-associated quality-control mechanisms from bacteria to humans

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 82, Issue 8, Pages 1451-1466

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.03.038

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DFG [SFB1036]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) of the NIH [R01 NS102414]
  3. Aventis Foundation
  4. Chica and Heinz Schaller Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ribosome-associated quality-control (RQC) is a process that surveys incomplete nascent polypeptides produced by interrupted translation. It involves the human ribosome, tRNA-binding protein NEMF, and other factors. RQC plays a critical role in the stability, modification, and degradation of nascent chains, and has undergone changes during evolution.
Ribosome-associated quality-control (RQC) surveys incomplete nascent polypeptides produced by inter-rupted translation. Central players in RQC are the human ribosome-and tRNA-binding protein, NEMF, and its orthologs, yeast Rqc2 and bacterial RqcH, which sense large ribosomal subunits obstructed with nascent chains and then promote nascent-chain proteolysis. In canonical eukaryotic RQC, NEMF stabilizes the LTN1/ Listerin E3 ligase binding to obstructed ribosomal subunits for nascent-chain ubiquitylation. Furthermore, NEMF orthologs across evolution modify nascent chains by mediating C-terminal, untemplated polypeptide elongation. In eukaryotes, this process exposes ribosome-buried nascent-chain lysines, the ubiquitin acceptor sites, to LTN1. Remarkably, in both bacteria and eukaryotes, C-terminal tails also have an extra-ri-bosomal function as degrons. Here, we discuss recent findings on RQC mechanisms and briefly review how ribosomal stalling is sensed upstream of RQC, including via ribosome collisions, from an evolutionary perspective. Because RQC defects impair cellular fitness and cause neurodegeneration, this knowledge provides a framework for pathway-related biology and disease studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available