4.7 Article

The effect of dehulling of yellow peas and faba beans on the distribution of carbohydrates upon dry fractionation

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 163, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113509

Keywords

Yellow peas; Faba beans; Dehulling; Air classification; Carbohydrate constituents

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway [267858, 319049]
  2. Norwegian Fund for Research Fees for Agricultural Products (FFL) [314599]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dehulling as a pre-treatment for dry fractionation has a significant impact on the distribution and content of low molecular weight carbohydrates in yellow peas and faba beans, leading to an increase in soluble non-starch polysaccharides and a slight reduction in indigestible oligosaccharides and phytic acid.
The impact of dehulling as a pre-treatment for dry fractionation on the distribution of inositol phosphate and the composition and quantity of different carbohydrates in the fine and coarse fractions from yellow peas and faba beans was elucidated. For peas, low molecular weight carbohydrates markedly increased during air classification in the fine fraction whereas for faba beans this tendency was less pronounced. Sucrose and raffinose series oligosaccharides were higher in the coarse and fine fractions, respectively, independently on dehulling pretreatment. A large part of the insoluble non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) was removed by dehulling and mostly assigned to cellulose. Dehulled faba beans and peas contained similar amount of total and soluble NSP, of which the latter were assigned to pectin and arabinogalactan. In general, dehulling increased the amounts of soluble NSP. Dehulling enriched phytic acid in remaining seeds and it was further enriched with protein in fine fractions. Regarding the aimed product e.g., fine fraction, dehulling gives a slight reduction of non-digestible oligosaccharides and phytic acid in peas but not in faba beans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available