4.4 Article

Feeding habits of Bryde?s and sei whales in the western North Pacific inferred from stomach contents and skin stable isotope ratios

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2022.102204

Keywords

Stable isotope; Stomach contents; Bryde?s whale; Sei whale; Feeding habits; Western North Pacific

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study clarified the feeding habits of Bryde's whales and sei whales in the western North Pacific through the analysis of stable isotope ratios and stomach contents. The results showed clear temporal differences in the feeding habits of these two whale species.
Gathering information on the diet composition of baleen whales at different temporal scales is useful for investigating their feeding habits. Bryde's whales (Balaenoptera edeni) and sei whales (B. borealis) are known to feed on crustaceans and pelagic fish in their western North Pacific feeding grounds; however, their feeding habits before arriving in the feeding area are not known. This study clarified the feeding habits of these two whale species by simultaneously analyzing nitrogen and carbon stable isotope ratios and stomach contents of individuals captured in the western North Pacific in 2015 and 2016. A stable isotope Bayesian mixed-model was used to estimate prey composition. The results showed clear temporal differences in the feeding habits of both whales. Specifically, Bryde's whales fed primarily on krill and pelagic and mesopelagic fishes as they migrated northwards, and then fed exclusively on krill during the summer. Sei whales fed on copepods when they arrived in the subarctic region before shifting to pelagic fish species in the summer. The differences in the feeding habits of these two whale species are attributed to their latitudinal segregation and the availability of prey species, especially in sei whales, which migrate to the subarctic region where copepods are abundant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available