4.7 Article

Remediation of Cd and Cu contaminated water and soil using novel nanomaterials derived from sugar beet processing- and clay brick factory-solid wastes

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 428, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128205

Keywords

Hazardous solid wastes; Toxic metals; Soil and wastewater remediation; Low cost nanomaterials; Microscopic investigations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, two novel nanomaterials were produced from sugar beet and brick factory residuals, and their ability to remove Cd and Cu from water and reduce metal availability in contaminated soil was assessed. The nanomaterials derived from sugar beet residual showed higher sorption capacity and removal efficacy compared to those from brick factory residual.
Producing nanomaterials from hazardous wastes for water and soil treatment is of great concern. Here, we produced and fully characterized two novel nanomaterials from sugar beet processing (SBR)-and brick factory residuals (BFR) and assed their ability for Cd and Cu sorption in water and reducing metal availability in a contaminated soil. The SBR removed up to 99% of Cu and 91% of Cd in water, and exhibited a significantly faster and higher sorption capacity (qmax (g kg-1) = 1111.1 for Cu and 33.3 for Cd) than BFR (qmax (g kg-1) = 33.3 for Cu and 10.0 for Cd), even at acidic pH. Soil metal availability was significantly reduced by SBR (up to 57% for Cu and 86% for Cd) and BFR (up to 36% for Cu and 68% for Cd) compared to the unamended soil. The higher removal efficacy of SBR over BFR could be attributed to its higher alkalinity (pH = 12.5), carbonate content (82%), and specific surface area, as well as the activity of hydroxyl -OH and Si-O groups. The nano-scale SBR and BFR, the former particularly, are novel, of low cost, and environmental friendly amendments that can be used for the remediation of metal-contaminated water and soil.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available