Agro-ecology science relates to economic development but not global pesticide pollution

Synthetic pesticides are core features of input-intensive agriculture and act as major pollutants driving environmental change. Agroecological science has unveiled the benefits of biodiversity for pest control, but research implementation at the farm-level is still difficult. Here we address this implementation gap by using a bibliometric approach, quantifying how countries' scientific progress in agro-ecology relates to pesticide application regimes. Among 153 countries, economic development does spur scientific innovation but irregularly bears reductions in pesticide use. Some emerging economies bend the Environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) - the observed environmental pollution by a country's wealth - for pesticides and few high-income countries exhibit a weak agro-ecology 'technique effect'. Our findings support recent calls for large-scale investments in nature-positive agriculture, underlining how agro-ecology can mend the ecological resilience, carbon footprint, and human health impacts of intensive agriculture. Yet, in order to effectively translate science into practice, scientific progress needs to be paralleled by policy-change, farmer education and broader awareness-raising.

Automated summary

This study uses a bibliometric approach to examine the relationship between scientific progress in agroecology and pesticide application regimes. The findings suggest that economic development may not necessarily lead to reductions in pesticide use. Some emerging economies exhibit negative environmental effects due to pesticide use, while some high-income countries have weak agricultural ecological techniques. The study supports the importance of investing in nature-positive agriculture to improve the environmental and health impacts of intensive agriculture.