4.7 Article

Cefiderocol: EUCAST criteria for disc diffusion and broth microdilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages 1662-1669

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac080

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reproducibility of cefiderocol MIC determination using broth microdilution in iron-depleted CAMHB was investigated. The EUCAST disc diffusion method for cefiderocol susceptibility testing was developed and validated against reference BMD. DD is a robust and easy-to-perform method for cefiderocol susceptibility testing.
Objectives The reproducibility of cefiderocol MIC determination using broth microdilution (BMD) in iron-depleted CAMHB (ID-CAMHB) was investigated, and the EUCAST disc diffusion (DD) method for cefiderocol susceptibility testing was developed and validated against reference BMD. Methods Cefiderocol values were determined for wild-type (WT) and non-WT isolates using BMD plates with ID-CAMHB (Thermo Scientific, Oakwood, USA) per EUCAST guidelines. DD was performed using standard EUCAST methodology on unsupplemented Mueller-Hinton agar with cefiderocol 30 mu g discs. Control agents were included in all tests. MICs were correlated with zone diameters (ZD), and ZD breakpoints (BP) best corresponding to the MIC BPs were determined. Areas of technical uncertainty (ATU) were included where appropriate. External laboratory validation of cefiderocol DD was performed per the EUCAST SOP 9.2. Results MIC and ZD distributions for cefiderocol against WT isolates were established. Cefiderocol ZD BPs were set at susceptible >= 22 mm, resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and ATUs were decided. For Acinetobacter baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, ZD cut-off values of >= 17 mm and >= 20 mm corresponded to MIC values of <= 2 and <= 0.5 mg/L, respectively. Cefiderocol ZDs for Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (target 27 mm) and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (target 26 mm) were within +/- 3 mm of the target values. For DD, there was no problematic variation between discs, media or laboratories. Conclusions DD is a robust and easy-to-perform method for cefiderocol susceptibility testing. For isolates with results in the ATU, an MIC test should be performed to confirm the results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available