4.4 Review

Diagnostic value of cardiac natriuretic peptide on pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

JOINT BONE SPINE
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105287

Keywords

Systemic sclerosis; Pulmonary arterial hypertension; Cardiac natriuretic peptide; Diagnostic value; Systematic review

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [81300243]
  2. Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province [2019YJ0634]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that NT-proBNP has certain diagnostic value for PAH due to its better specificity and moderate sensitivity, but its clinical application value remains suboptimal and cannot be a stand-alone decision-making diagnostic tool for SSc-PAH.
Objective: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Many risk factors and predictors of outcomes have been identified in these patients. Btype natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) serum levels are often elevated in SSc patients with early PAH. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the diagnostic value of BNP/NT-proBNP in systemic sclerosis secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH). Methods: A systematic search was performed through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to January 30, 2021. Stata 16.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX) was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Results: A total of 9 studies involving 220 SSc-PAH patients and 259 non-SSc-PAH controls were included. The values of sensitivity and specificity using BNP and NT-ProBNP as diagnostic tools were pooled in the diagnostic meta-analysis. The overall performance of BNP/NT-ProBNP detection was: pooled sensitivity, 0.67 (95% CI: 0.52 to 0.79); pooled specificity, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.91); pooled positive likelihood ratio, 4.3 (95% CI: 3 to 6.1); and pooled negative likelihood ratio, 0.39 (95% CI: 0.28 to 0.55). The subgroup analysis showed similar results. Funnel plots indicate that there is no evidence for publication bias. Conclusions: Our results revealed that NT-proBNP has certain diagnostic value for PAH due to its better specificity and moderate sensitivity, but its clinical application value remains suboptimal and can not be a stand-alone decision-making diagnostic tool of SSc-PAH. (c) 2021 Socie acute accent te acute accent franc , aise de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available