4.6 Article

Economic Analysis of Membrane-Based Separation of Biocatalyst: Mode of Operation and Stage Configuration

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 61, Issue 19, Pages 6682-6692

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00598

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. A * STAR (Singapore) Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering (AME) [A20B3a0070, A2083c0049]
  2. Singapore Ministry of Education [2019-T1-002-065, RG100/19, MOE-MOET2EP10120-0001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the economic aspects of ultrafiltration of biocatalysts, considering different operating modes, stage configurations, and various factors such as flow rate, flux, transmembrane pressure, membrane area, recovery, and filtration rate. The results show that installing a new ultrafiltration unit requires significant capital expenditure, while the operating cost depends on specific operating mode and fluid flow rate.
As the use of biocatalyst proliferates due to the need for chirally pure active pharmaceutical ingredients (API), the corresponding separation of biocatalyst and API is crucial. Although economic analyses of membrane-filtration applications exist, one dedicated to the ultrafiltration of biocatalysts remained amiss, which motivated the current study. The costs for different operating modes (i.e., constantflux or constant-TMP) and stage configurations (i.e., single versus multiple stages), as well as the effects of feed flow rate, flux, transmembrane pressure (TMP), membrane area, recovery, and filtration rate, were evaluated. The results indicate that a capital expenditure of $1.35 million and an annual operating expenditure of $85.6 thousand are needed to install a new ultrafiltration unit for a yearly permeation of 0.64 billion liters. While capital cost depends heavily on membrane area, operating cost depends on TMP and fluid flow across the unit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available