4.8 Article

Fuzzy-Entropy-Based Game Theoretic Shadowed Sets: A Novel Game Perspective From Uncertainty

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 597-609

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3042250

Keywords

Dichotomy algorithm; fuzzy entropy; game theory; shadowed sets; three-way approximations

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0 804002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61876201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes the FeGTSS model based on fuzzy entropy loss, analyzes the fuzzy entropy loss of shadowed sets, searches for the optimal game strategy in calculating (alpha, beta) based on the dichotomy algorithm, and extends and discusses the FeGTSS model based on analysis of different data distribution types.
As a three-way approximation of fuzzy sets, shadowed sets have attracted extensive attention in recent years. A fundamental issue in the process of constructing shadowed sets is the interpretation and determination of the threshold pair (alpha, beta), and the uncertainty consistency, that is, the consistency of fuzzy entropy. However, there may be a large fuzzy entropy loss between a fuzzy set and its corresponding game theoretic shadowed sets (GTSS), and the GTSS model is also accompanied by a large time cost when the precision of (alpha, beta) is improved. Therefore, the fuzzy-entropy-based GTSS (FeGTSS) is proposed in this article from the perspective of fuzzy entropy loss. First, based on the compromise principle of game theory, the fuzzy entropy loss of shadowed sets is analyzed in this article. Second, in the process of calculating (alpha, beta), the optimal game strategy is searched based on the dichotomy algorithm. Third, the FeGTSS model is extended and discussed based on the analysis of different data distribution types. Finally, the rationality and validity of the FeGTSS model are illustrated through instances and experimental analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available