4.7 Article

Versatile Ni-Ru catalysts for gas phase CO2 conversion: Bringing closer dry reforming, reverse water gas shift and methanation to enable end-products flexibility

Journal

FUEL
Volume 315, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.123097

Keywords

CO2 recycling; Dry Reforming of Methane; Reverse Water-Gas Shift; CO2 methanation; Ni-Ru bimetallic catalyst

Funding

  1. Department of Chemical and Process Engineering of the University of Surrey
  2. Doctoral College of the University of Surrey
  3. Royal Society Research Grant [RSGR1180353]
  4. CO2ChemUK through the EPSRC grant [EP/P026435/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the performance of a combination catalyst of Ni and Ru in reactions such as dry reforming of methane, reverse water-gas shift, and CO2 methanation. The catalyst shows excellent stability in CO2 hydrogenation reactions but suffers from coke formation in dry reforming. Overall, the study highlights the versatility of the Ni-Ru/CeO2-Al2O3 catalyst for gas phase CO2 recycling and its switchable selectivity control.
Advanced catalytic materials able to catalyse more than one reaction efficiently are needed within the CO2 utilisation schemes to benefit from end-products flexibility. In this study, the combination of Ni and Ru (15 and 1 wt%, respectively) was tested in three reactions, i.e. dry reforming of methane (DRM), reverse water-gas shift (RWGS) and CO2 methanation. A stability experiment with one cycle of CO2 methanation-RWGS-DRM was carried out. Outstanding stability was revealed for the CO2 hydrogenation reactions and as regards the DRM, coke formation started after 10 h on stream. Overall, this research showcases that a multicomponent Ni-Ru/CeO2 -Al2O3 catalyst is an unprecedent versatile system for gas phase CO2 recycling. Beyond its excellent performance, our switchable catalyst allows a fine control of end-products selectivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available