3.9 Article

Eplerenone treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

Journal

JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 535-542

Publisher

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2016.01.008

Keywords

Central serous chorioretinopathy; Eplerenone; Subretinal fluid; Mineralocorticoid receptors; Treatment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. - To evaluate the efficacy of eplerenone, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, in the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). Materials and methods. - We conducted a retrospective study of 27 patients treated with eplerenone for chronic CSCR of at least 3 months duration. For each patient, visual acuity and macular OCT (central retinal thickness, height of foveal subretinal fluid (SRF), central choroidal thickness) were evaluated before treatment and at 1 month and 3 months. In the case of complete disappearance of SRF at 1 month, treatment was discontinued and follow-up was performed at 3 months. Results. - Central retinal thickness was 371.6 mu m (266-573 mu m) before treatment. A clear decrease in retinal central thickness and height of SRF was observed at 1 month in 74% of patients (20 of 27 patients, central retinal thickness: 322.6 mu m at 1 month, P=0.01), with improvement of visual acuity in all of these patients. Follow-up at 3 months also found a decrease in SRF and central retinal thickness (294.3 mu m, P=0.002). Six patients had complete resolution of SRF at 1 month, without recurrence at 3 months. Six other patients had complete resolution of SRF at 3 months. No side effects requiring treatment discontinuation were observed. Conclusion. - In our study, eplerenone was associated with regression of central retinal thickness and height of SRF. Eplerenone appears to be a safe and effective treatment for chronic CSCR, with a probable mechanism of action on the pathophysiology of this disease. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available