4.5 Article

Guided bone regeneration using titanium mesh to augment 3-dimensional alveolar defects prior to implant placement. A pilot study

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages 607-621

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/clr.13922

Keywords

GBR; titanium meshes; virtual planning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the outcomes of bone regeneration using a customized titanium mesh scaffold, achieving up to 88% bone regeneration in 74% of cases. However, 26% of cases resulted in failures, emphasizing the importance of operator expertise in determining the final outcome.
Objectives To evaluate the outcomes of bone regeneration using a customized titanium mesh scaffold to cover a bone graft for reconstruction of complex defects of the jaws. Materials and Methods 19 large defects were digitally reconstructed using CT scans according to the prosthetic requirements. A titanium mesh scaffold was designed to cover the bone (autologous/bovine bone particulate) graft. At least 6 months after surgery, a new cone-beam CT was taken. The pre- and postoperative CT datasets were then converted into three-dimensional models and digitally aligned. The actual mesh position was compared to the virtual position to assess the reliability of the digital project. The reconstructed bone volumes (RBVs) were calculated according to the planned bone volumes (PBVs), outlining the areas under the mesh. These values were then correlated with the number of exposures, locations of atrophy, and virtually planned bone volume. Results The mean matching value between the planned position of the mesh and the actual one was 82 +/- 13.4%. 52.3% (40% early and 60% late) exposures were observed, with 15.8% exhibiting infection. 26.3% resulted as failures. The amount of reconstructed bone volume (RBV) in respect to PBV was 65 +/- 40.5%, including failures, and 88.2 +/- 8.32% without considering the failures. The results of the exposure event were statistically significant (p = .006) in conditioning the bone volume regenerated. Conclusions This study obtained up to 88% of bone regeneration in 74% of the cases. The failures encountered (26%) should underline the operator's expertise relevance in conditioning the final result.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available