The effect of scan and patient parameters on the diagnostic performance of AI for detecting coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The effect of scan and patient parameters on the diagnostic performance of AI for detecting coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
CLINICAL IMAGING
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 149-158
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2022-02-04
DOI
10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.01.016
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- AI Evaluation of Stenosis on Coronary CT Angiography, Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve
- (2022) William F. Griffin et al. JACC-Cardiovascular Imaging
- CT EvaLuation by ARtificial Intelligence For Atherosclerosis, Stenosis and Vascular MorphologY (CLARIFY): A Multi-center, international study
- (2021) Andrew D. Choi et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
- Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging vs Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosis of Invasive Vessel-Specific Coronary Physiology
- (2020) Wijnand J. Stuijfzand et al. JAMA Cardiology
- Image reconstruction in cardiovascular CT: Part 2 – Iterative reconstruction; potential and pitfalls
- (2019) U. Tayal et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
- Image reconstruction: Part 1 – understanding filtered back projection, noise and image acquisition
- (2019) R. Schofield et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
- Application of Low Tube Potentials in CCTA
- (2019) Thomas J. Stocker et al. JACC-Cardiovascular Imaging
- Maximization of the usage of coronary CTA derived plaque information using a machine learning based algorithm to improve risk stratification; insights from the CONFIRM registry
- (2018) Alexander R. van Rosendael et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
- Coronary CT Angiography and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction
- (2018) NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD
- (2018) Hyuk-Jae Chang et al. JACC-Cardiovascular Imaging
- Rationale and Design of the CREDENCE Trial: computed TomogRaphic evaluation of atherosclerotic DEtermiNants of myocardial IsChEmia
- (2016) Asim Rizvi et al. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
- Submillisievert coronary calcium quantification using model-based iterative reconstruction: A within-patient analysis
- (2016) Annemarie M. den Harder et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
- Comparison of contrast enhancement, image quality and tolerability in Coronary CT angiography using 4 contrast agents: A prospective randomized trial
- (2015) Lily Honoris et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
- Automated selection of the optimal cardiac phase for single-beat coronary CT angiography reconstruction
- (2015) D. Stassi et al. MEDICAL PHYSICS
- SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee
- (2014) Jonathon Leipsic et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
- Impact of a New Motion-Correction Algorithm on Image Quality of Low-Dose Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Insufficient Heart Rate Control
- (2013) Tobias A. Fuchs et al. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
- Iterative Reconstruction to Preserve Image Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy at Reduced Radiation Dose in Coronary CT Angiography
- (2013) Wei-Hua Yin et al. JACC-Cardiovascular Imaging
- Coronary computed tomography angiography during arrhythmia: Radiation dose reduction with prospectively ECG-triggered axial and retrospectively ECG-gated helical 128-slice dual-source CT
- (2012) Ashley M. Lee et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
- A Low Tube Voltage Technique Reduces the Radiation Dose at Retrospective ECG-gated Cardiac Computed Tomography for Anatomical and Functional Analyses
- (2011) Seitaro Oda et al. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
- Step and shoot coronary CT angiography using 256-slice CT: effect of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality
- (2011) D. Muenzel et al. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
- 64-MDCT Coronary Angiography of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Influence of Heart Rate on Image Quality and Efficacy in Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease
- (2009) Lin Yang et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
- Body physique and heart rate variability determine the occurrence of stair-step artefacts in 64-slice CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering
- (2009) Lars Husmann et al. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
- Prognostic Value of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Prediction of Cardiac Events in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
- (2009) Martin Hadamitzky et al. JACC-Cardiovascular Imaging
- Diagnostic Performance of 64-Multidetector Row Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Individuals Without Known Coronary Artery Disease
- (2008) Matthew J. Budoff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
- Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Angiography by 64-Row CT
- (2008) Julie M. Miller et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Dual-Source CT in Step-and-Shoot Mode: Noninvasive Coronary Angiography with Low Radiation Dose1
- (2008) Paul Stolzmann et al. RADIOLOGY
- Prospectively Gated Transverse Coronary CT Angiography versus Retrospectively Gated Helical Technique: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose
- (2008) James P. Earls et al. RADIOLOGY
- How to use a prospective gated technique for cardiac CT
- (2008) James P. Earls Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started