4.7 Article

Biodegradation of PFOA in microbial electrolysis cells by Acidimicrobiaceae sp. strain A6

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 292, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133506

Keywords

Microbial electrolysis cells; PFAS; PFOA; Ammonium; Acidimicrobiaceae sp. strain A6; Defluorination; Dehalogenation; Degradation

Funding

  1. Princeton IP Accelerator Fund
  2. NSF [2055015]
  3. SERDP project [ER20-1219]
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [2055015] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that Acidimicrobiaceae sp. strain A6 can biodegrade PFAS by utilizing the anode in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs), which lays the foundation for further research on A6-based PFAS bioremediation in water treatment.
Acidimicrobiaceae sp. strain A6 (A6), is an anaerobic autotrophic bacterium capable of oxidizing ammonium (NH4+) while reducing ferric iron and is also able to defluorinate PFAS under these growth conditions. A6 is exoelectrogenic and can grow in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) by using the anode as the electron acceptor in lieu of ferric iron. Therefore, cultures of A6 amended with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) were incubated in MECs to investigate its ability to defluorinate PFAS in such reactors. Results show a significant decrease in PFOA concentration after 18 days of operation, while producing current and removing NH4+. The buildup of fluoride and shorter chain perfluorinated products was detected only in MECs with applied potential, active A6, and amended with PFOA, confirming the biodegradation of PFOA in these systems. This work sets the stage for further studies on the application of A6-based per-and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) bioremediation in microbial electrochemical systems for water treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available