4.0 Article

Mapping the Roles of Nutrition and Dietetics Professionals in Sustainable Food Systems and Exploring Opportunities for Strategic Collaboration

Journal

Publisher

DIETITIANS CANADA
DOI: 10.3148/cjdpr-2022-008

Keywords

Dietitian; food systems; sustainability; sustainable food systems; role

Funding

  1. Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences at Acadia University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current food systems pose challenges in terms of environmental damage, social injustice, and health issues. Registered Dietitians and Nutritionists have the potential to contribute to addressing these challenges due to their positions and skillsets. This paper provides theoretical proposals and collective expertise in supporting the sustainable development of the global food system, highlighting the work of RDs, approaches to applying their skills, and opportunities for collaboration.
Current food systems drive environmental damage, social injustices, and undermine health, and these challenges are complex and seemingly intractable. Collaboration is required to transition to more sustainable food systems (SFS). Registered Dietitians and Nutritionists (RDs) are an under-leveraged and well-positioned group to contribute to addressing food systems challenges because of their locations in the system and their existing skillsets. Drawing on research with dietitians, this perspective paper presents both a theoretical proposal as well as collective expertise in supporting sustainable development of the global food system. It highlights where RDs work in food systems with the aim to reveal multiple points of entry where RDs can and do contribute to SFS across food systems, approaches to apply, as well as opportunities for collaboration within and beyond the profession. Educational and societal barriers exist that prevent systematic RD engagement; however, examples of established work provide models to follow.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available