4.7 Article

Comparative holistic assessment of using vacuum insulated panels for energy retrofit of office buildings

Journal

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 214, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108934

Keywords

Thermal insulation; Vacuum insulation panel; Building retrofit; Dynamic simulation; Payback period; Embodied carbon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research proposes a holistic methodology for accurately assessing the financial and environmental feasibility of using thermal insulation materials in building retrofitting. The methodology is applied to a case study of an office building, where different types of insulation materials are simulated and analyzed under various climate conditions. The results show that the holistic approach, taking into account heating and cooling loads as well as space value, favors the use of advanced materials such as vacuum insulation panels, with a payback time of 1.3 to 4.2 years. However, the environmental assessment reveals that traditional materials like mineral wool have a significantly lower carbon payback time compared to vacuum insulation panels, suggesting the need for environmentally-friendly production processes.
This research proposes the application of a holistic methodology for the accurate assessment of financial and environmental feasibility of applying thermal insulation materials, including advanced materials such as vacuum insulation panels (VIPs), for energy efficient building retrofit. The methodology is applied to a case study in which different insulation materials, both traditional (Mineral wool; XPS) and advanced insulation (VIPs), are applied as internal insulation to a typical office building requiring retrofit. The building is simulated through dynamic performance simulation under different climate conditions to evaluate its annual energy needs. Financial and energy analysis including embodied carbon are performed using a proposed holistic approach. The financial feasibility highlighted traditional heating only approach might be lacking in correctly identifying energy savings, leading to overestimating for traditional materials with payback time as low as 6.4 years for mineral wool. The holistic approach, accounting for the heating and cooling loads and value of space saved, favours advanced materials such as VIPs as soon as the space reaches high enough value, with payback time between 1.3 and 4.2 years for locations investigated. However, the environmental assessment shows that mineral wool has significantly lower carbon payback time compared to VIPs. For VIPs to be competitive environmentally, lower impact core materials or alternatively higher percentage of recycled/reused fumed silica need to be considered in their production. The holistic methodology presented for the first time allows to consider the implications of embodied carbon of insulation materials used in building retrofitting along with the financial and operational energy considerations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available