4.6 Article

Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Analysis From the US Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT Registry

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume 9, Issue 21, Pages 2189-2199

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.026

Keywords

aortic stenosis; heart failure; mortality; pacemaker; registry; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Funding

  1. American College of Cardiology Foundation's STS/ACC TVT Registry
  2. Novella and Premiere
  3. Abbott Vascular
  4. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  5. American College of Cardiology
  6. National Institutes of Health T-32 training grant [T32 HL069749, L30 HL124592]
  7. Philips Medical Systems
  8. Boston Scientific

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND Conduction abnormalities leading to PPM implantation are common complications following TAVR. Whether PPM placement can be predicted or is associated with adverse outcomes is unclear. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing TAVR in the United States at 229 sites between November 2011 and September 2014 was performed using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT Registry and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database. RESULTS PPM placement was required within 30 days of TAVR in 651 of 9,785 patients (6.7%) and varied among those receiving self-expanding valves (25.1%) versus balloon-expanding valves (4.3%). Positive predictors of PPM implantation were age (per 5-year increment, odds ratio: 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.15), prior conduction defect (odds ratio: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.63 to 2.29), and use of self-expanding valve (odds ratio: 7.56; 95% CI: 5.98 to 9.56). PPM implantation was associated with longer median hospital stay (7 days vs. 6 days; p < 0.001) and intensive care unit stay (56.7 h vs. 45.0 h; p < 0.001). PPM implantation was also associated with increased mortality (24.1% vs. 19.6%; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.58) and a composite of mortality or heart failure admission (37.3% vs. 28.5%; hazard ratio HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.56) at 1 year but not with heart failure admission alone (16.5% vs. 12.9%; HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.63). CONCLUSIONS Early PPM implantation is a common complication following TAVR, and it is associated with higher mortality and a composite of mortality or heart failure admission at 1 year. (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available