Minimally invasive separation surgery for the treatment of spinal metastases with small incision and freehand pedicle screw fixation: the surgical learning curve
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Minimally invasive separation surgery for the treatment of spinal metastases with small incision and freehand pedicle screw fixation: the surgical learning curve
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2022-03-22
DOI
10.1186/s12891-022-05191-2
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A Comparative Study Between Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Traditional Open Surgery for Patients with Spinal Metastasis
- (2020) Xiaojun Zhu et al. SPINE
- Separation surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: A qualitative review
- (2020) Giuseppe Di Perna et al. Journal of Bone Oncology
- Neurological outcomes after surgery for spinal metastases in symptomatic patients: Does the type of decompression play a role? A comparison between different strategies in a 10-year experience
- (2020) F. Cofano et al. Journal of Bone Oncology
- The Potential of Minimally Invasive Surgery to Treat Metastatic Spinal Disease versus Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2018) Victor M. Lu et al. World Neurosurgery
- Hybrid Therapy for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression: Technique for Separation Surgery and Spine Radiosurgery
- (2018) Ori Barzilai et al. Operative Neurosurgery
- Learning Curve of Minimally Invasive Surgery Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
- (2018) Chao Liu et al. World Neurosurgery
- Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery for Patients With Spinal Metastasis
- (2017) Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt et al. SPINE
- A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases
- (2017) Tomohiro Hikata et al. Clinical Spine Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screws Fixation and Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for the Surgical Treatment of Thoracic Metastatic Tumors With Neurologic Compression
- (2016) Yutong Gu et al. SPINE
- The learning curve of lateral access lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population: a prospective study
- (2015) Chong Leslie Lich Ng et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with standard open surgery for vertebral thoracic metastases causing acute myelopathy in patients with short- or mid-term life expectancy: surgical technique and early clinical results
- (2015) Massimo Miscusi et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Posterior thoracic corpectomy with cage reconstruction for metastatic spinal tumors: comparing the mini-open approach to the open approach
- (2015) Darryl Lau et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Complications Associated With the Initial Learning Curve of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
- (2014) Joseph A. Sclafani et al. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
- Preoperative embolization of hypervascular spinal tumors: current practice and center experience
- (2014) Stylianos Pikis et al. NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH
- Learning curve of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy
- (2012) Hsien-Ta Hsu et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Learning Curve and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
- (2012) Jae Chul Lee et al. SPINE
- Diagnosis and management of metastatic spine disease
- (2010) Daniel M. Sciubba et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Spinal Cord Compression in Patients With Advanced Metastatic Cancer
- (2008) Janet L. Abrahm et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started