4.8 Review

Development of High-Energy Anodes for All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries Based on Sulfide Electrolytes

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 61, Issue 25, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202201249

Keywords

All-Solid-State Batteries; Anode Materials; Anodeless Batteries; Li-Metal Batteries; Sulfide Electrolytes

Funding

  1. Basic Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - MSIT [2020R1A4A1019463]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A4A1019463] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

All-solid-state Li batteries (ASSBs) offer better performance and safety than current liquid-based Li-ion batteries (LIBs). Sulfide ASSBs have been extensively studied and advanced. There is a well-established research on suitable cathode materials for sulfide ASSBs, but little has been published on anode materials for sulfide ASSBs and future research directions.
All-solid-state Li batteries (ASSBs) promise better performance and higher safety than the current liquid-based Li-ion batteries (LIBs). Sulfide ASSBs have been extensively studied and considerably advanced in recent decades. Research on identifying suitable cathode materials for sulfide ASSBs is currently well established, with great progress being made in the commercialization of layered cathodes in the liquid-based LIBs. Research on anode materials for sulfide ASSBs is of great importance for enhancing the battery energy density. However, it seems that little has been published that summarizes studies of anode materials for sulfide ASSBs and suggests future research directions. Thus, within this Minireview, we aim to provide an overview of previous and current research focused on anode materials for sulfide ASSBs and to suggest a future research direction for developing suitable anode systems for sulfide ASSBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available