4.0 Article

Uncertainty from sample preparation in the laboratory on the example of various feeds

Journal

ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 61-66

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00769-014-1096-x

Keywords

Sample preparation; Analytical variability; Technical variability; Uncertainty; Feedingstuffs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A way of uncertainty calculation from test sample preparation in the laboratory was presented on the example of feeds. The essence of the proposal lies in separating two components of results' variability expressed as coefficient of variation CV (p): analytical variability CV (a) (repeatability) and technical variability CV (h) corresponding with the inhomogeneity of a component. The law of Gauss's error propagation was used. Analytical variability CV (a) was calculated from the range of duplicate analyses, following Nordtest Handbook. It was assumed that the coefficient of technical variability CV (h) is the measure of the standard uncertainty from sample preparation in the uncertainty budget of a method u (s+h), and expanded uncertainty U (s+h) for k = 2 (P = 95 %) can be easily calculated as U (s+h) = 2 u (s+h). Calculated uncertainties with uncertainties from sample preparation for loose feed and no ground premixture have increased from 4 to 125 % and were higher than analytical uncertainties calculated acc. to GUM during validation of methods. In the case of granulated feed mixture, the obtained uncertainties were similar. Grinding the premix results in lower uncertainties. Uncertainty from sample preparation should be taken into account in the uncertainty budget of a test method, especially in the case of inhomogeneity of tested materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available