4.0 Article

Selection and validation of reference gene for RT-qPCR studies in co-culture system of mouse cementoblasts and periodontal ligament cells

Journal

BMC RESEARCH NOTES
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-022-05948-x

Keywords

Reference genes; Cementoblasts; Periodontal ligament cells; RT-qPCR; Co-culture

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to identify reliable reference genes suitable for RT-qPCR studies in a co-culture system of OCCM-30 and SV-PDL cells. The results showed that PPIB and POLR2A combination was the most stable reference gene combination in the co-culture system for normalizing gene expression in these two cell lines.
Objective RT-qPCR is a reliable method for gene expression analysis, but the accuracy of the quantitative data depends on the appropriate selection of reference genes. A Co-culture system consisting of periodontal ligament cells (SV-PDL) and cementoblasts (OCCM-30) to investigate the crosstalk between these two cell lines under orthodontic condition is essential for experimental orthodontic setups in-vitro. Therefore, we aimed to identify a set of reliable reference genes suitable for RT-qPCR studies for prospective co-culture systems of OCCM-30 and SV-PDL cells. Results The results demonstrated that PPIB, GUSB and RPLP0 turned out to be the three most stable reference genes for OCCM-30 in the co-culture system, while PPIB, POLR2A and RPLP0 have the three highest rankings for SV-PDL cells in the co-culture system. The most stable gene combination were PPIB and POLR2A in the co-culture system. In conclusion, PPIB is overall the most stably expressed reference gene for OCCM-30 or SV-PDL cell line in the system. The combination of PPIB and POLR2A as reference genes are indicated to be the potential and mandatory to obtain accurate quantification results for normalizing RT-qPCR data in genes of interest expression in these two cell lines co-culture systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available