4.2 Article

Carbon Border Adjustment Measures: A Straightforward Multi-Purpose Climate Change Instrument?

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 25-52

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jel/eqab028

Keywords

Carbon border adjustment measures; carbon pricing; carbon leakage; fair competition; climate leadership; Paris Agreement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The author challenges the perception of CBAM as straightforward multi-purpose instruments, analyzing the different purposes and legal designs, and demonstrating in the EU context that they primarily serve as tools for climate leadership.
Carbon border adjustment measures (CBAMs) are instruments that can be used to mitigate climate change, but also have a positive impact on trade, climate leadership and even public finance. In this article, I challenge the view that they can serve as straightforward multi-purpose instruments. In a first step, I analyse each of the purposes that can be achieved through CBAMs and explain their underlying differences. In a second step, I discuss their legal design and explain how CBAMs' design features affect the types of purposes that they can achieve. I apply this two-step analytical framework to the European Union context, where a proposal for a regulation establishing a CBAM has been published by the European Commission in July 2021. I demonstrate that the design of the EU CBAM is inconsistent with the Commission's main objectives of promoting fair competition and climate mitigation in line with the Paris Agreement. The EU CBAM proposal is primarily an instrument of climate leadership.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Law

Supporting the Transition to Climate-Neutral Production: An Evaluation Under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures

Roland Ismer, Harro van Asselt, Jennifer Haverkamp, Michael Mehling, Karsten Neuhoff, Alice Pirlot

Summary: To achieve climate neutrality, carbon emissions in basic material production must be reduced. Support measures adopted by governments must comply with the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. This article analyzes three selected support schemes and finds that the current regime of free allocation may face challenges, while a combination of free allocation and a charge on carbon-intensive materials would ensure consistent carbon pricing and not be considered a subsidy. Carbon contracts for difference could also be designed to avoid conferring benefits and constituting a subsidy.

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW (2023)

Article Economics

When International Trade Law Meets Tax Policy: The Example of Digital Services Taxes

Alice Pirlot, Henri Culot

Summary: This article analyzes the potential incompatibility of digital services taxes (DSTs) with World Trade Organization (WTO) law and proposes tax proposals to tackle challenges in the digital economy. While there may be good tax policy reasons to oppose DSTs, arguments based on WTO law provide a relatively weak justification to oppose such taxes.

JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE (2021)

Article Environmental Studies

To ban or not to ban carbon-intensive materials: A legal and administrative assessment of product carbon requirements

Timo Gerres, Manuel Haussner, Karsten Neuhoff, Alice Pirlot

Summary: By setting near-zero-emission requirements for products sold in the European single market, the EU can accelerate the phase-out of carbon-intensive production processes, incentivizing the shift to a carbon-neutral society. PCRs represent a new development in technical regulations and can be designed in accordance with WTO law.

REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW (2021)

Article Law

Taxation as a Means of Migration Control: The Case of Hungary

Luc Leboeuf, Alice Pirlot

INTERTAX (2019)

No Data Available