3.9 Article

The effect of chitosan nanoparticles on Escherichia coli viability in drinking water disinfection

Journal

WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 537-543

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wpt.2022.012

Keywords

antimicrobial agent; Chitosan; nanomaterials; water disinfection

Funding

  1. ERA-NET EU-LAC Health project Efficient and affordable water treatment technologies to minimize waterborne diseases [RTD/2018/26]
  2. Riga Technical University's Doctoral Grant programme [DOK.BIF/20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, chitosan nanoparticles (CNs) were prepared and tested for their antimicrobial activity in drinking water disinfection. The results showed that 0.25% medium molecular weight CNs were optimal for inhibiting the growth of E. coli in tap water.
Drinking water disinfection or inactivation of pathogenic microorganisms is an essential step to minimize infection risks and decrease the incidence of waterborne diseases. Recently, chitosan nanoparticles (CNs) have been highlighted as an antimicrobial agent for a wide range of applications due to its natural antimicrobial properties, and low or no toxicity risk for human health. In this study, we generated CNs from three different molecular weight (MW) chitosan (low, medium, high) at various concentrations (0.25, 0.5 and 2% (w/v)). After the CNs preparation and quality assessment, the antimicrobial activity was evaluated by measuring the log reduction of Gram-negative bacteria E. coli as a model-microorganism for faecal pollution. The results demonstrated that 0.25% of medium MW CNs are optimal for more than 99.99% reduction of cultivable E. coli and 97% inactivation of metabolically active E. coli. These results indicated that CNs were able to inhibit the growth of cultivable and metabolically active E. coli in tap water and demonstrated the potential use of CNs as an alternative antimicrobial agent in drinking water disinfection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available