3.8 Article

Callous-unemotional traits, social goal orientations, and bullying perpetration: exploring concurrent associations during adolescence

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE AND YOUTH
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 135-148

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02673843.2022.2037441

Keywords

Callous-unemotional traits; social goal orientations; bullying; cyberbullying; adolescence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the association between callous-unemotional traits, social goal orientations, and bullying/cyberbullying behaviors. It finds direct and indirect links between callous-unemotional traits and both agentic and communal goals, shedding light on the mechanisms underlying bullying perpetration.
Bullying and cyberbullying is a severe problem afflicting adolescents worldwide, underscoring the need to understanding of the mechanisms behind bullying perpetration. In the current study, we examined the association between callous-unemotional traits, social goal orientations, and bullying/cyberbullying behaviours. The current study draws upon a sample of 435 adolescents, who completed an online questionnaire. A path model, which separately included the dimensions of callous-unemotional traits, revealed that callousness and agentic goals had a direct positive association with bullying and cyberbullying behaviours; uncaring also had a direct positive association with cyberbullying behaviour. There was a direct positive effect from callousness and uncaring onto agentic goals, and a negative effect onto communal goals. Unemotionality had a direct negative effect onto both agentic and communal goals. There was an additional indirect effect, linking callous-unemotional traits to bullying/cyberbullying behaviour via social goal orientations. We discuss the findings, drawing upon motivational, evolutionary, and social-emotional deficiency perspectives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available