4.7 Article

Learning from text and video blogs: comprehension effects on secondary school students

Journal

EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 5249-5275

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10819-2

Keywords

Reading comprehension; Video blogs; Notetaking; Adolescents

Funding

  1. CRUE-CSIC
  2. Springer Nature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that video blogs can be as effective for learning as text blogs, and note-taking can help students with lower reading comprehension learn from text blogs.
Informational video blogs are a popular method of communication among students that may be fruitful educational tools, but their potential benefits and risks remain unclear. Streaming videos created by YouTubers are often consumed for entertainment, which may lead students to develop habits that hinder in-depth information processing. We aimed to test this hypothesis by comparing students' perceived attention to task, metacognitive calibration of their level of comprehension, and comprehension outcomes between reading text blogs and watching video blogs. We also examined the influence of notetaking. 188 lower secondary students read two text blog entries and watched two video blog entries, and completed a series of tasks. Results showed no statistically significant effect of blog format and notetaking on students' perceived on-task attention, metacognitive calibration, and comprehension of blog entries. Nevertheless, we found a triple interaction effect of format, notetaking, and students' reading comprehension on blog entry comprehension. Only students low in reading comprehension benefited from notetaking and only when they read the text blog entries. These results indicate that video blogs can be as suitable for learning as text blogs and that notetaking can help struggling readers overcome their difficulties when learning from text blogs but not from video blogs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available