4.5 Review

A bibliometric review of research on COVID-19 and tourism: Reflections for moving forward

Journal

TOURISM MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100912

Keywords

COVID-19; Pandemic; Tourism; Hospitality; Crisis; Reflective review; Bibliometric analysis; Research themes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By using a bibliometric analysis approach, this study reviewed and analyzed the rapidly emerging literature on COVID-19 in tourism and hospitality. The findings suggest that current research tends to be descriptive, premature, and theoretical, advocating for a more sustainable, responsible, and equitable post-pandemic tourism without investigating in-depth how these theoretical proclamations will be implemented.
By adopting a bibliometric analysis approach, this study systematically reviews and retrospectively analyses the rapidly emerging literature on COVID-19 in tourism and hospitality. A co-word analysis revealed the intellectual structure of 177 papers (published until January 2021) consisting of four major themes discussing the following various issues: 1) the impact of COVID-19 on tourist decision-making, destination marketing, technology adoption, and tourists' well-being; 2) the future of tourism post COVID-19; 3) managing change in tourism; and 4) the COVID-19's impacts on tourism and hospitality stakeholders. The findings show that preliminary publications tend to be descriptive, pre-mature and theoretical, i.e. most studies advocate and re-imagine a more sustainable, responsible and equitable post-pandemic tourism, but almost no research investigates in-depth whether, why and how such theoretical proclamations are being materialized or not and/or whether they will remain a COVID-19 induced fuss. The paper concludes by offering various directions and propositions for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available