4.2 Article

White spaces in brown(ing) places: toward the spatialization of critical immigration studies

Journal

ETHNIC AND RACIAL STUDIES
Volume 45, Issue 13, Pages 2445-2467

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2022.2030485

Keywords

Immigration; Latinx; racialization; organizations; public space; whitespace

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores how the everyday and organizational uses of public space affect the racialization of Latinx in different contexts. Through a theoretical and empirical analysis, the study examines the relationship between race, space, and immigration. The findings highlight the experiences of Latinx in racially diverse communities and their adaptation and negotiation in racialized spaces.
This article examines how the everyday and organizational uses of public space shape Latinx racialization. We contextualize the maturing migrant destinations of the US South and rural Midwest. Specifically, in Springdale, Arkansas and Marshall, Missouri, where the 1990s settlement of Latinx migrants transformed these from homogenously White to racially diverse communities. Hence, brown(ing) places. As a theory-driven empirical assessment, we model race, space, and immigration. This conceptual framework underlines how Latinxs experience racialized (dis)involvement in public life. Through a comparative ethnography, we illustrate how Latinxs adapt, negotiate, and contest racialized space. Just as much, we reveal the organizational, experiential, and built forms that reproduce community space as whitespace. We juxtapose to theories of whitespace as highly structured and continuous, derived from contested uses, and/or produced by dominant interests. In effect, our spatialized rendering of critical immigration studies addresses issues of racialized inclusion/exclusion across diversifying community-organizational contexts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available