4.4 Article

Multifactorial causal beliefs and colorectal cancer screening: A structural equation modeling investigation

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages 2463-2477

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/13591053211037737

Keywords

cancer cognitions; colorectal cancer; multifactorial beliefs; oncology; risk perception

Funding

  1. Dr. Roberts' start-up funds
  2. NCATS [KL2TR002490]
  3. Hamilton-NCI [P30 CA008748]
  4. ACS [MRSG-16020-01-CPPB]
  5. Roberts-NCATS [KL2TR002490]
  6. Vu-National Cancer Institute [F31 CA243220-01]
  7. National Cancer Institute [R25 CA112383]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study tested a conceptual model on the relationship between individuals' understanding of multifactorial nature of cancer and colorectal cancer screening, finding that multifactorial causal beliefs were associated with cancer risk perceptions and cancer cognitions, but not with colorectal cancer screening behavior. Further research is needed to determine if the model can be applied to other cancer-related health behaviors.
We tested a conceptual model that describes the relationship between individuals' understanding of the multifactorial nature of cancer and their self-reported colorectal cancer screening. We collected cross-sectional survey data from 205 men and women age 50-75. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The proposed model had reasonable fit (RMSEA = 0.09, CFI = 0.65). Multifactorial causal beliefs were associated with cancer risk perceptions (beta = 0.16, p = 0.019) and more optimistic cancer cognitions (beta = 0.17, p = 0.013). However, these constructs were not associated with colorectal cancer screening (p's > 0.05). Further testing could reveal whether this model can be applied to other cancer-related health behaviors including lifestyle changes and genetic testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available