4.4 Article

Designing an Online Retail Marketplace: Leveraging Information from Sponsored Advertising

Journal

MARKETING SCIENCE
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 115-138

Publisher

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2021.1307

Keywords

e-commerce marketplace; platform design; search advertising; position auctions; retailing; asymmetric information

Categories

Funding

  1. Amazon.com

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the design of a marketplace in e-commerce platforms, taking into account asymmetric information between sellers and the platform. Using a game theory model, the study focuses on maximizing marketplace profit by considering factors such as seller participation, ad auctions, and commission rates. The results highlight the importance of strategic listing and the balance between advertising revenue and sales commissions in platform profitability.
E-commerce platforms, such as Amazon and Alibaba, enable hundreds of millions of consumers to search and purchase products offered by millions of independent sellers who can advertise their products on the platforms. In this paper, we study how to design such a marketplace when there are two types of asymmetric information-sellers have some private information about their products that the platform does not have, whereas the platform has private information about consumers that the sellers do not have. Using a game theory model, we formulate the marketplace design problem as maximizing marketplace profit (comprising ad revenues and sales commissions) by jointly considering the following elements: ensuring sellers join the platform, specifying the auction that enables sellers to advertise in the sponsored list, leveraging the information revealed in the ad auction to refine the organic list, and setting the commission rate on sales to consumers who are rational and heterogeneous in their preferences. We show that sellers' bids in ad auctions, through which sponsored slots are allocated, can reveal the sellers' private information to the platform (information effect), which it can optimally combine with information that it has about consumers to improve the placement of organic results, a practice we call strategic listing. However, by introducing an externality between the sponsored and organic sides, strategic listing also leads to more competition in the ad auction (competition effect), thus reducing the incentive of sellers to join the platform. The platform can incentivize sellers to join by reducing the commission rate on sales; however, under certain conditions, the platform must also reduce the degree of strategic listing (i.e., commit to limiting the influence of the sponsored ad auction outcomes on the placement of organic results). If the sellers' participation is sufficiently difficult to induce, the platform obtains a larger proportion (under some conditions, all) of its revenue from advertising than from sales commissions. Our results shed light on the variation in practices across different platforms and provide timely guidance for platforms to refine their marketplace design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available