4.6 Article

Investigating public preferences for the management of native and invasive species in the context of kelp restoration

Journal

MARINE POLICY
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104680

Keywords

Discrete choice experiment; Southern Rock Lobster; Kelp forest; Habitat; Economic value; Marine reserves

Funding

  1. University of Tasmania

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Southern Rock Lobster plays a crucial role in managing the Long Spined Sea Urchin, whose southern shift has caused 'urchin barrens' in kelp forests. Various restoration options exist, but public acceptability has not been tested. Households in Tasmania are willing to pay for restoration measures, with direct intervention being valued higher than artificial solutions.
The Southern Rock Lobster (Jasus edwardsii) is key to management of the Long Spined Sea Urchin (Centrotephanus rodgersii). The southern shift of the urchin has created 'urchin barrens' of the kelp forests (Ecklonia radiata and Macrocystis pyrifera) in coastal waters off the East Coast of Tasmania. Consistently high fishing efforts of large Southern Rock Lobster in the region has reduced natural predation of the urchin. A number of restoration options exist but these options have not been tested for acceptability with the public to date. In this study we estimate the willingness to pay by households in Tasmania for Southern Rock Lobster habitat and management. The willingness to pay estimates can be used in benefit-cost analysis of the various combinations of restoration options supporting decision-making in this Australian marine planning context. Results indicate that direct replanting of kelp is worth $37 per household per year for five years and a 1% increase in the area of marine reserves is worth $2 per household per year for five years. Direct intervention to control sea urchin populations by reintroducing Rock Lobsters or capturing and crushing urchins is worth $33 and $31 respectively per household per year for five years. Households did not support artificial kelp beds installations or subsidising urchin farming operations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available