Quality of life in restorative versus non-restorative resections for rectal cancer: systematic review
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Quality of life in restorative versus non-restorative resections for rectal cancer: systematic review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BJS Open
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages -
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Online
2021-09-17
DOI
10.1093/bjsopen/zrab101
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Factors impacting time to ileostomy closure after anterior resection: The UK CLOSure of Ileostomy Timing cohort study (CLOSE‐IT)
- (2021) Peter Vaughan‐Shaw Colorectal Disease
- Anal function and quality of life analysis after laparoscopic modified Parks for ultra-low rectal cancer patients
- (2020) Haibo Ding et al. World Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Definition of the Rectum
- (2019) Nigel DʼSouza et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Comparison of overall survival and quality of life between patients undergoing anal reconstruction and patients undergoing traditional lower abdominal stoma after radical resection
- (2019) P. Du et al. Clinical & Translational Oncology
- Quality of life with or without sphincter preservation for rectal cancer
- (2019) Marie‐Louise Feddern et al. Colorectal Disease
- Quality of life and anterior resection syndrome after surgery for mid to low rectal cancer: A cross-sectional study
- (2018) Loris Trenti et al. EJSO
- Late assessment of quality of life in patients with rectal carcinoma: comparison between sphincter preservation and definitive colostomy
- (2018) Mariane Messias Reis Lima Silva et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer
- (2018) Sergio A. Acuna et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Long-term Outcomes After Surgery Involving the Pelvic Floor in Rectal Cancer: Physical Activity, Quality of Life, and Health Status
- (2018) Tijmen Koëter et al. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
- Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer
- (2017) David Jayne et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision
- (2016) Bin Ma et al. BMC CANCER
- A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery?
- (2016) C. Simillis et al. Colorectal Disease
- Prospective assessment of the quality of life in patients treated surgically for rectal cancer with lower anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection
- (2016) E. Monastyrska et al. EJSO
- Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer: Do We Overshoot the Mark?
- (2016) Johannes Klose et al. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
- Patient-centered outcomes to decide treatment strategy for patients with low rectal cancer
- (2016) Michitaka Honda et al. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
- Robotic-assisted surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer: the current evidence
- (2016) Guixiang Liao et al. Scientific Reports
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- (2016) Jonathan AC Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- (2016) Jonathan AC Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of Sphincter-Sparing Surgery Versus Abdominoperineal Resection in Rectal Cancer
- (2015) Marcia M. Russell et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer
- (2015) H. Jaap Bonjer et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Chronic pain in the pelvic area or lower extremities after rectal cancer treatment and its impact on quality of life
- (2015) Marie-Louise Feddern et al. PAIN
- Validation of the SF-36 as a measure of postoperative recovery after colorectal surgery
- (2014) Ioana Antonescu et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- The English National Low Rectal Cancer Development Programme: key messages and future perspectives
- (2013) B. J. Moran et al. Colorectal Disease
- Quality of life of patients after low anterior, intersphincteric, and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer—a matched-pair analysis
- (2013) Julia Konanz et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
- Quality of life assessment by applying EORTC questionnaires to rectal cancer patients after surgery and neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment
- (2013) Juan Ignacio Arraras et al. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS
- Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score
- (2012) Katrine J. Emmertsen et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Comparative Quality of Life in Patients Following Abdominoperineal Excision and Low Anterior Resection for Low Rectal Cancer
- (2012) P. How et al. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
- Validation of the Danish version of the disease specific instrument EORTC QLQ-CR38 to assess Health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer
- (2012) Henriette Thaysen et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Coloanal anastomosis or abdominoperineal resection for very low rectal cancer: what will benefit, the surgeon's pride or the patient's quality of life?
- (2012) Rosa Digennaro et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
- THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES
- (2012) Andra Morrison et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- Long-term quality of life in pouch patients compared with stoma patients following rectal cancer surgery
- (2011) K. Mrak et al. Colorectal Disease
- Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer
- (2009) R.N. Whistance et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Unacceptable variation in abdominoperineal excision rates for rectal cancer: time to intervene?
- (2008) E Morris et al. GUT
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started