4.3 Article

Azoospermia and reciprocal translocations: should whole-exome sequencing be recommended?

Journal

BASIC AND CLINICAL ANDROLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12610-021-00145-5

Keywords

Meiotic arrest; Non-obstructive azoospermia; Translocation; Whole-exome sequencing; TMPRSS9

Categories

Funding

  1. Fondation maladies rares

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of chromosome rearrangements on spermatogenesis in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, highlighting the importance of genetic testing beyond karyotyping. The use of whole-exome sequencing was found essential, especially for consanguineous patients, in order to provide the best possible genetic counselling and assess the likelihood of successful testicular sperm extraction. Defects in the TMPRSS9 gene were identified as possibly impacting spermatogenesis, providing valuable insights for future clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Background Although chromosome rearrangements are responsible for spermatogenesis failure, their impact depends greatly on the chromosomes involved. At present, karyotyping and Y chromosome microdeletion screening are the first-line genetic tests for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Although it is generally acknowledged that X or Y chromosome rearrangements lead to meiotic arrest and thus rule out any chance of sperm retrieval after a testicular biopsy, we currently lack markers for the likelihood of testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in patients with other chromosome rearrangements. Results We investigated the use of a single nucleotide polymorphism comparative genome hybridization array (SNP-CGH) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) for two patients with non-obstructive azoospermia and testicular meiotic arrest, a reciprocal translocation: t(X;21) and t(20;22), and an unsuccessful TESE. No additional gene defects were identified for the t(X;21) carrier - suggesting that t(X;21) alone damages spermatogenesis. In contrast, the highly consanguineous t(20;22) carrier had two deleterious homozygous variants in the TMPRSS9 gene; these might have contributed to testicular meiotic arrest. Genetic defect was confirmed with Sanger sequencing and immunohistochemical assessments on testicular tissue sections. Conclusions Firstly, TMPRSS9 gene defects might impact spermatogenesis. Secondly, as a function of the chromosome breakpoints for azoospermic patients with chromosome rearrangements, provision of the best possible genetic counselling means that genetic testing should not be limited to karyotyping. Given the risks associated with TESE, it is essential to perform WES - especially for consanguineous patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available