4.6 Article

Intestinal Microbiota and Serum Metabolic Profile Responded to Two Nutritional Different Diets in Mice

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.813757

Keywords

germ-free diet; nutrient; microbiota; metabolism; gut development

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [31902189]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2662020DKQD004, 2662019PY012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is an interaction and bidirectional selection between dietary intake and gut microbiota. Germ-free diets are not suitable for the growth and development of SPF mice, as they increase the level of pro-inflammatory bacteria in the gut and significantly alter the mouse's serum metabolic profile.
There is an interaction and bidirectional selection between dietary intake and gut microbiota due to the different efficiency of nutrients in the gut. The nutritional composition of germ-free (GF) diets differs significantly from specific pathogen-free (SPF) diets. There is, however, no data revealing how SPF animals from the same microbial background respond to them and if they affect the host. We examined the growth of SPF mice on the GF diet and found that it reduced body weight, intestinal length and intestinal morphology. Interestingly, the GF diet increased the level of pro-inflammatory bacteria in the gut of SPF mice, including Proteobacteria, Burkholderiaceae, Alloprevotella and Parasutterella. Furthermore, GF diets caused significant increases in malondialdehyde (MDA), IL-1 beta, IL-6, and D-lactate levels in the serum of SPF mice and significantly altered their serum metabolic profile, especially amino acid metabolism. In conclusion, GF diets are not suitable for the growth and development of SPF mice. These findings, based on the role of gut microbiota in diet selection, provide new insights into the scientific and rational use of experimental animal diets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available